Tuesday, 2 March 2010

Four-star Morales sets target -- ESPN STAR

ESPNSTAR.com

Erik Morales has set his sights on becoming the first Mexican to win world titles at four different weights.

Morales returns to the ring later this month after an absence of over two years.

The 33-year-old, a seven-time world champion and the last man to defeat Manny Pacquiao, takes on former WBA lightweight champion Jose Alfaro in Monterrey on March 27 for the WBC Intercontinental welterweight crown.

Morales (48-6) first captured the WBC super bantamweight title in 1997 and held it through to 2000, making eight successful defences, also adding the WBO belt with his victory against another Mexican fighting legend, Marco Antonio Barrera.

He moved up in weight and in 2000 and won the WBC featherweight championship, which he held for two years, later recapturing the WBC featherweight belt in 2002.

He moved up again to add the WBC super featherweight title to his growing hardware collection in 2004 and five months later he took the IBF super featherweight title, before the IBA super featherweight belt against Pacquiao.

Morales' victims over the years reads like a who's who list and, in addition to Pacquiao and Barrera, includes Pauli Ayala, Irishman Wayne McCullough, Junior Jones, Carlos Hernandez, Jesus Chavez, Guty Espadas, Jr., Daniel Zaragoza and Kevin Kelly.

"I return with desire to succeed," said Morales. "My plan is to win my fourth world title. We chose Alfaro as my opponent because he is so respected.

"It's true, I had some personal problems, received bad advice and had many temptations. I worked hard on it and now I'm better than before. I feel much better, so we took a risk fighting a man of Alfaro's quality."

But Nicaraguan knockout specialist Alfaro (23-5), who has defeated world champions Prawet Singwancha and DeMarcus Corley, believes it's his time.

"Morales is finished," claimed the 26-year-old. "His past was great but not now. I'm younger, stronger and faster that him and I will demonstrate that on March 27 in Monterrey.

"Morales is definitely wrong to continue boxing. This is a business and something that gives me a better life. I will come to beat him and will win."

The undercard features a WBA light heavyweight eliminator between former champion Hugo Hernan Garay and Chris Henry, plus a strawweight throw-down between unbeaten WBA champion Roman "Chocolalito" Gonzalez (25-0, representing Nicaragua, and world rated Mexican contender Juan Hernandez (15-1).

Source: espnstar.com

***




I'm so good I know I'll win -- The Sun

By GAVIN GLICKSMAN, The Sun

FLOYD MAYWEATHER claims he is so good he does not even need to watch his opponents in action before a fight.

Mayweather puts his undefeated record on the line against Shane Mosley in Las Vegas on May 1.

But Money insists his training regime will not include studying tapes of the 38-year-old's previous bouts.

He said: "I don't study my opponents, I just adjust and adapt once I get inside that squared circle.

"The ability that I'm blessed with is that I can work them out when I'm in there."

Mayweather returned to the ring last September after a two-year absence to outclass Juan Manuel Marquez in a unanimous points victory.

Fight fans are desperate to see him take on Manny Pacquiao but the 33-year-old claims his showdown with Mosley will keep them on the edge of their seats.

He added: "On May 1, two of the best welterweights of this era are meeting in a toe-to-toe battle — and you must watch it."

With 40 wins under his belt, Mayweather is widely regarded as one of the best fighters in the history of the sweet science.

A victory against Pacquiao would be the icing on the cake but the American insists he can live without the pound-for-pound king.

And he is adamant there is not a boxer on the face of the planet who can defeat him.

He said: "You put in the hard work in the boxing gym and mentally you are extremely strong.

"You try to keep your mind focused, be positive and know that you're going to be victorious."

Source: thesun.co.uk

***




Manny Pacquiao's Star Power Keeps Rising -- FanHouse

By Lem Satterfield, FanHouse

Manny Pacquiao is a congressional candidate in his native Philippines, where a super hero movie he starred in there debuted on Christmas.

He has been the subject of large, or front page features in Time Magazine, the New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, and ESPN's Body Issue -- the latter along with athletes such as Dwight Howard and Serena Williams.

While he was celebrating his 31st birthday in General Santos City, Philippines, on Dec. 17, with thousands of his country men and dignitaries in attendance, Pacquiao received the news that it was being announced, at the same time, in America, that he had been named among Time Magazine's Top 25 People Who Mattered in 2009 -- listed alphabetically right behind the United States' first African American president, Barack Obama.

And on Tuesday, March 3, the seven-division champion and current WBO welterweight (147 pounds) king will make his second appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live -- the same place on which Pacquiao (50-3-2, 38 knockouts) stole the show from beginning to end on Nov. 3.

Pacquiao's first appearance came about two weeks prior to his dethroning Miguel Cotto as WBO champ with a 12th-round knockout on Nov. 14, just as his second one will come about two weeks prior his first defense of the belt -- a March 13 clash with former IBF titlist, Joshua Clottey (35-3, 20 KOs), of Ghana slated for The Dallas Cowboys' Stadium in Arlington, Tex.

A three-time Fighter Of The Year who was recently named Fighter Of The Decade, Pacquiao even rubs elbows with other celebrities at the Wild Card Boxing Club, where he is being prepared for Clottey by four-time Trainer Of The Year, Freddie Roach.

Pacquiao is also expected to be featured sometime in the fall on 60 Minutes, which will have access to the fighter from the moment he lands in Dallas for his bout with Clottey, all the way up until the show airs, according to Lee Samuels, publicist for Pacquiao's promoter, Top Rank.

During a recent workout, Robert Duvall visited Pacquiao and Roach (all pictured above, from left to right), the gym's owner and proprietor.

Asked if he would agree that Pacquiao has become a cross-over star, the figher's Bob Arum, CEO of Top Rank, said "That's 100 percent correct."

"That was our goal when we started with Manny, was to break him out from the Filipino base that he had. We were able to pick up millions of Hispanic fans and we have broken him in to the general conscience of the people around the world," said ," Arum.

"Manny is truly a crossover star," said Arum, who has promoted Muhammad Ali, and compares Pacquiao favorably to him in popularity. "How many fighters of our time go on Jimmy Kimmel Live? How many fighters go on Good Morning America, like he's going to be doing? And how many fighters have a big article coming out in Time magazine, which he is going to have again? I think that is saying something."

On the last Jimmy Kimmel Live, Pacquaio was introduced by the host as "The Pride Of The Philippines," and nearly every gesture that Pacquiao made was greeted by cheers or laughter or both from the largely Filipino audience.

Considered boxing's premiere fighter, pound-for-pound, Pacquiao's fist name -- "Manny!" -- was repeatedly chanted by the members of the crowd.

The fighter opened the show by smashing hanging pumpins with his fists -- much like he does heavybags in training or rivals in the ring. And he closed it by singing with the members of the Jimmy Kimmel Live band, just as he did while holding a late-night concert right after defeating Cotto.

Since losing to Erik Morales in March of 2005, Pacquiao is 11-0, with eight knockouts. That run includes two knockouts of Morales, victories over Marco Antonio Barrera and Juan Manuel Marquez, and, in his last four bouts, knockouts of David Diaz, Oscar De La Hoya, Ricky Hatton, and, Cotto, respectively.

Pacquiao (pictured at right, on the left, with Julio Cesar Chavez) has said that after his bout with Clottey, he will immediately return to the Philippines and concentrate on the political side of his life.

Pacquiao did rule out retirement.

"In the election, I am leading. And the start of campaigning is March 26, so it will not be until after my fight. After the fight, I will go back to the Philippines and start campaigning," said Pacquiao.

"It is going to be busy. I want to pass some bills that will be good for the livelihood of the people there and education for the children," said Pacquiao. "This is my last fight before the election. I am not saying I'm going to retire. It is hard to say right now when I'm going to retire, but this is my last fight before the election, and I'm very excited about it."

Source: boxing.fanhouse.com

***




Mayweather-Mosley Kicks Off Today: And It's Bigger Than Pacquiao-Clottey -- The Sweet Science

By Frank Lotierzo, The Sweet Science

This afternoon Floyd Mayweather 40-0 (25) and Shane Mosley 46-5 (39) will meet at the Nokia Theater at Times Square in New York City in the first of their three city press tour promoting their upcoming May 1st mega-fight at the MGM Grand Garden Arena in Las Vegas. Wednesday afternoon the 3rd they'll be in Washington DC and Thursday the 4th they'll be in Los Angeles to conclude the tour and promotion.

Mosley, 38, is the defending WBA welterweight champion and Mayweather, 33, is a former WBC title holder and both are considered among the top-5 pound-for-pound fighters in professional boxing. Mayweather-Mosley or Mosley-Mayweather has been talked about and debated for years. And though it's coming to fruition (and it will unless one of them is injured during training) about five to seven years late, that doesn't detract from how big it is.

Mosley fought one of the most complete fights of his career in January of 2009 when he knocked out the rugged and tough Antonio Margarito to capture his title. And Mayweather never looked more purposeful and sure of himself than when he took apart Juan Manuel Marquez in his last bout this past September.

As most boxing observers know, this fight is being realized because Mayweather and Manny Pacquiao couldn't strike an agreement to meet later this year. Mosley's title defense against Andre Berto, who is a Haitian native, fell through due to the 7.0 magnitude earthquake in Haiti last month. And I don't care if Mayweather was forced to take this fight because he needed to face an opponent who was perceived to be a real threat to beat him this time. The bottom line is Floyd Mayweather and Shane Mosley will be two of the only three men occupying the inside of a boxing ring on the night of May 1st this year.

It's been said here that Mayweather brought up the HGH/PED's issue to get inside Pacquiao's head and to try and win the first two rounds of their fight before the bell rang for the first round. Nothing has changed and I still think that's the case. I've also said that against fighter-A, Manny is a bigger draw than Floyd at the gate, especially after the way he looked in defeating Miguel Cotto in his last fight. Not to mention Pacquiao's legacy is deeper than Mayweather's and he's fought and defeated better opposition than Floyd has.

Basically, Manny has upstaged Floyd at just about every turn since Floyd announced his comeback on the afternoon of Pacquiao-Hatton. But the truth must be told, and this time regardless of the reasons as to why, Mayweather is facing the better opponent. It's undeniable that Mosley is the bigger fish in a pond that contains he and Joshua Clottey. Mayweather is not just meeting the better opponent than Pacquiao is in their next respective fights, but his fight is going to do bigger PPV numbers.

There's just no way around it, anticipating Mayweather and Mosley in the ring is much more compelling and intriguing than the anticipation of Pacquiao-Clottey. And though both Pacquiao and Mayweather are favored to win if Clottey were to defeat Pacquiao it would turn the boxing world upside down and everyone reading this knows it. Granted, Clottey is a live underdog and he does bring some things like size and a presumed strength advantage into the fight that may trouble Manny, but how many expect him to win? On the other hand, Mosley beating Mayweather, even by stoppage, shouldn't be considered an upset by anyone who knows what they've been watching during the careers of both fighters.

This column has been critical of Mayweather over the last eight months. But it's never been personal or mean spirited and I've only stated it as I believe it to be. And that's Floyd Mayweather is a great fighter. But he's picked his spots and avoided the fighters who truly could've tested him throughout his career and perhaps even defeated him. So in many aspects I believe his undefeated record is a little hollow and manufactured. Maybe by the time he retires I'll see him in a different light? However, that's not the issue at hand today.

The bottom line is Pacquiao-Mayweather wasn't made and I could care less who's fault it was. All I know is Mayweather drew the tougher opponent as a result of it. Mayweather-Mosley is a bigger and more anticipated fight than Pacquiao-Clottey.

And it will be realized on May 1st, and the countdown to it begins this afternoon. Yes - seeing the names Mayweather and Mosley on the marquee gets the blood pumping more than seeing Pacquiao vs. Clottey. And that's in spite of Manny Pacquiao being boxing's biggest star and current pound-for-pound greatest fighter.

No one fighter, even if he's the biggest draw in the sport, is more interesting to the public than a genuinely interesting two-way fight.

Frank Lotierzo can be contacted at GlovedFist@Gmail.com

Source: thesweetscience.com

***




Questions for Dr. Goodman on random blood testing

Boxing News World

Don’t get me wrong. Anything that is good for boxing is good to me. If random blood testing means fewer injuries in the ring, I won’t be against it.

However, as I’ve emphasized in my previous blogs, the implementation of a new regulation such as random blood testing is the sole responsibility of the boxing commissions. If a boxer is dissatisfied with a current regulation and wants a change, then he should bring his grievance before the boxing commission for consideration. No matter how good your intention is, imposing your own rule or regulation by cloaking it behind the definition of “contractual agreement” is not only wrong, but also unethical.

Recently, a couple of articles from Fanhouse regarding random blood testing have caught my attention. One in particular was ‘Dr Margaret Goodman’s Top 15 Ways to Improve Boxing’ penned by Fanhouse’s boxing editor Lem Satterfield. Although the article did contain some very good ideas from Dr. Goodman whom Mr. Satterfield described as “a former Nevada State Athletic Commission Medical Advisory Board Chairman and Chief Ringside Physician who has a private practice as a neurologist in Las Vegas, Nevada”, and who “worked more than 400 professional bouts as a ringside physician and is an advocate for blood testing in boxing as well as the MMA as a means of policing and improving those sports for the safety of its participants”, the article simply failed to elaborate on these ideas. Reading it was like reading a contents page of a magazine or an instruction pamphlet of a new appliance, to be civilly candid.

Based upon Mr. Satterfield’s detailed and generous description of Dr. Goodman, I have an impression that Dr. Goodman was a very knowledgeable and influential person in the commission. So it is a surprise to me now that random blood testing was not implemented during her tenure as the Nevada State Athletic Commission Medical Advisory Board Chairman. After all, the sport has officially had PED problems for a decade and a half now. So, why all of a sudden came up with these bright ideas now? Where were these before?

Perhaps I was expecting too much from a veteran writer, but if I had been in Mr. Satterfield’s shoes, I would certainly have asked Dr. Goodman some, if not all, of these questions to support her clever ideas.

1. The WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency) and/or the USADA (United States Anti-Doping Agency) should run the drug testing program for boxing and MMA.

Questions: Would WADA and/or USADA hire third parties (private agencies and laboratories) to conduct random blood testing to thousands of active professional boxers around the globe? If third parties are involved, how would Dr. Goodman ensure the integrity of test results?

2. Complete WADA and USADA approved testing at the weigh-in and right after the fight -- both for blood and urine.

Question: If the weigh-in is set too close to the fight time (the day of the contest), could Dr. Goodman confidently guarantee that drawing blood from boxers (who are usually weak during weigh-in) will not in any way negatively affect (physically and mentally) their performance in the ring?

3. Once becoming a licensee, each fighter must always make his whereabouts known to the commission on a regular basis, and must agree to unannounced random testing.

Questions: Could Dr. Goodman confirm that regular disclosure of personal whereabouts and unannounced random blood testing are not in any shape or form a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution that protects the right of citizens (in case of foreign boxers, their rights under the laws of their countries)? Is Dr. Goodman aware of the fact that several sports bodies such as the ICC (International Cricket Council) have had major problems with this “whereabouts” clause?

4. Uniformity of testing protocols and prohibited substance lists across the United States that should be made available to every licensee, including fighters, trainers, managers, promoters and officials.

Question: If WADA would run the drug testing program, why not follow its World Anti-Doping Code testing program and prohibited substance list? These information are readily available on WADA’s website.

5. Required educational classes for athletes following the weigh-in to discuss prohibited substances and their harmful effects, especially performance enhancing drugs.

Questions: Why educational classes following the weigh-in? Why not some other time? How long would these “educational classes” be?

6. For all championship bouts, random unannounced blood and urine tests performed at least twice before a bout is held. Non-championship fighters should be randomly chosen.

Question: Considering that there are probably hundreds of non-championship fights being held in a month worldwide and random blood testing isn’t exactly cheap, who would pay for these costly tests?

7. Penalties -- like those implemented by the USADA and WADA -- for athletes who miss testing. These infractions must be posted on the Federal Suspension List which carries and denotes fighter suspensions from competition.

Question: Who would pay for the travel expenses of boxers, or the personnel that will conduct random blood testing to boxers, residing outside the United States and far from WADA-accredited testing laboratories?

8. Stop the ridiculous protocol of allowing fighters 48 hours to show up for a test once requested. How can that be considered unannounced?

Question: Apart from the truth that random testing introduces a presumption of guilt, and is a violation of privacy if the boxer is actually free from PEDs, conducting tests when boxers are in the middle of personal, social, religious, ethnic, and cultural activities is more ridiculous, is it not Dr. Goodman?

9. I would immediately set up a summit to be overseen by the commission which determines the best way to institute these changes. I would invite all knowledgeable parties, including Don Caitlin, USADA chief Travis Tygart, members of WADA, as well as BALCO founder, Victor Conte.

Question: Can Dr. Goodman confirm that outside parties that will be invited in the institution of these changes will not in any way forward their own business interests?

10. Do not allow the Association of Boxing Commissions and individual commissions to hide behind the notion that PED testing is too costly to entertain. This would improve the credibility of their organization.

Questions: How would Dr. Goodman react to the belief of many experts that random blood testing might be completely ineffective considering that athletes and their pharmacists (and physicians) are two or three steps ahead of WADA’s “experts”? Are these PED tests really for the safety of the boxers or only for the improvement of the credibility of the boxing commissions? Is Dr. Goodman aware of the fact that FIFA “spent $30 million annually on 33,000 doping tests on soccer players” but “there are only about 10 positive results”? (Check out FIFA unannounced dope testing procedure.)

11. Each commission must talk to its legislature about ways to help funnel money from tax-generated income to institute and expand testing.

Question: I sought the opinion of a lawyer (who is also a boxing manager) on this issue and the response I got was “the American athletic commissions are really just political tools of a given state without much lobbying power to request expanded powers”. So, how could the commission effectively find ways to help funnel money from tax-generated income if the commission itself is pretty much powerless?

12. I would ask promoters to help pay for drug-testing from a minor portion of ticket sales.

Question: Asking promoters to help pay drug-testing simply means asking boxers to give up a portion of their purse because the additional premium that promoters would have to pay would surely be revisited upon the boxers on a given card. So how could Dr Goodman ensure that boxers’ purse wouldn’t go lighter if promoters help pay for drug-testing?

13. Sanctioning bodies should pay a significant portion of drug screens for championship fights.

Question: Same as the above.

14. As had been done in some jurisdictions regarding proper training techniques, I would require all trainers to undergo a class on PED's and to pass a test to be licensed.

Question: What for? With so many on-going researches about “Chinese herbs, African medicines (plants and insects), etc.”, PED “science” is still in the infancy stage and will constantly change.

15. Commissions should work with amateur organizations to educate the fighters on PED's.

Question: Why? Are amateur organizations that incompetent to educate their fighters on PEDs?

Unless I get answers to these questions, I would only consider Dr. Goodman’s “Top 15 Ways to Improve Boxing” as a good advertisement for an international independent agency called WADA.

- Marshall N. B. marx7204@lycos.com

***




USADA's Travis Tygart on Floyd Mayweather, Shane Mosley -- FanHouse

By Lem Satterfield, FanHouse

United States Anti-Doping Agency chief executive, Travis Tygart, has been brought in to oversee the Olympic-style, random blood-testing that will be used on undefeated Floyd Mayweather and WBA welterweight (147 pounds) super champion, Shane Mosley, leading up to their May 1 fight at The MGM Grand in Las Vegas.

This method of testing, to be implemented in boxing for the first time ever, was at the center of the controversy that led to the failed negotiations of a match up between Mayweather and WBO welterweight (147 pounds) king and seven-division titlist, Manny Pacquiao.

Up until this point, boxing has only used urinalysis to detect the use of steroids and other illegal drugs. Tygart spoke to FanHouse about his role in the drug-testing implementation of Mayweather--Mosley, each of whom has agreed to be subjected to the random method of testing as part of their contract negotiations.

FanHouse: What protocol is set up for a fight of this nature and magnitude in general?

Travis Tygart: Both fighters, and both camps have reached out to us to put in the gold standard testing for the fight, and so, we're just trying to work out the final details.

I can't talk about the specifics of it at this stage, but I can certainly talk about it, hypothetically, about the two boxers wanting us to put in a program and what it would look like.

The protocol would fall under the USADA protocol for testing, which implements the mandatory provisions from the World Anti-Doping Code, setting out the full list of prohibited substances and methods from the WADA 2010 list.

It would put an emphasis on both blood and urine, out of competition, no advance notice testing.

FH: So, in other words, drugs would be tested for and the testing will be unannounced, random testing for both blood and urine?

Tygart: The random notion, it would be used intelligently. We don't like the word random, because that implies that you have a lottery bag, and you're pulling out all of these balls.

We will look at the fighters' individual training schedules, and the date of the competition, and execute what we would call an intelligence-based testing plan on them utilizing the world class, WADA-accredited sport drug-testing laboratories for sample analysis.

The collections will be done in accordance with the international standards for testing, so that the athletes have the maximum comfort in the collection process, but also ensuring the sample integrity.

There will be individualized education for the participants, so that they are fully aware of what's tested for and what's not, and their responsibilities under this type of program.

FH: Will the results be released to the commission, and, as received, in turn, also, to the public?

Tygart: Certainly any adverse reports would not be confidential. Transparency is a key piece to any program.

If someone has tested positive and has had a full, and, fair opportunity to challenge the test results or explain why they tested positive, and a sanction ultimately results -- that will be made public.

FH: The Nevada State Athletic Commission does not test, specifically, for EPO, HGH, and others things like provigil, clembuterol, and insulin. Are there any substances that are not necessarily tested for or detectable by the commission's normal procedures that will be a positive result under the USADA and WADA standards, and, as a result, grounds for the fight being canceleld or the removal of a fight participant who tests positive?

Tygart: We follow the WADA prohibited list. If the world has agreed that it's a performance-hancing and dangerous drug to the health of an athlete, or that it violates the spirit of sports, then its on the list and will be tested for.

FH: Can you disclose how close to the fight, and to the weigh-in the fighters can and will be tested?

Tygart: Testing can be done at really any time and at any place. Unannounced. And you know the importance of that. Fighters can't have knowledge of when they're going to be tested because they can attempt to do things to avoid detection.

FH: Can fighters be tested for things like gene-doping, and methods such as that?

Tygart: Where there is a scientifically valid test, and it's prohibited, it's tested for.

FH: How important is it to you that this inaugural venture into boxing be done with the utmost of credibility?

Tygart: We won't be involved with a program that is not credible. So we'll ensure a full and effective and credible program for clean athletes if we're involved.

FH: How helpful was it to have at least had the platform to speak on regarding the Floyd Mayweather-Manny Pacquiao fight to set you up for putting in place what you need to put in place for this fight?

Tygart: I think that's a really good question. One athlete wanted to do the right thing, and we want the right thing for all athletes, and so it's pretty simple to put the right program in place if there's a desire for it.

I think that you have to give credit to the athlete and the camp. Clean athletes are what we do, and sometimes, it only takes one athlete to make an impact and a difference in a particular sport. And let's hope that that's what ultimately happens here.

FH: What is your reaction to how Floyd Mayweather (pictured at right) has been viewed as a result of his stance?

Tygart: Look, I think, absolutely, that he has taken an admirable stand. Any time an athlete wants to have an effective anti-doping program in place, and he has the leverage to do it, then they should demand it.

We've certainly seen or heard of athletes who have retired from sports because they don't want to compete on a drug-infested playing field.

And so, when you have one athlete who is unwilling to participate in a single match, but has plenty of other opportunities, I mean, I think that that needs to be well-respected, and, well-supported as well.

FH: Do you believe that, eventually, the sports of boxing and MMA will be forced into changing their rules?

Tygart: It's just so easy to do the right thing. There's no reason that they shouldn't. Hopefully, it doesn't take a scandal or deaths to force them to do that.

Hopefully, one athlete can stand up and demand it, and that will enlighten others toward putting it in place. One way or another, it's going to eventually catch up to them if they don't.

So, hopefully, this is the catalyst that drives those sports toward changing, quicker, and they don't wait on a BALCo-type scandal like baseball had to deal with, and others had to deal with. Or God forbid, some harm happens to some fighters.

FH: Is there anything that you would like to add?

Tygart: I appreciate the interest in it. It's critically important. There are some difference-makers out there in the sport who are going to make this happen, and, hopefully, that will have long-term, positive benefits for the sport.

Source: boxing.fanhouse.com

***




Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. receives seven-month suspension -- Las Vegas Sun

By Brett Okamoto, Las Vegas Sun

Undefeated Mexican boxer Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. appeared before the Nevada State Athletic Commission on Monday to plead for its leniency after testing positive for a diuretic following a unanimous-decision win Nov. 14 over Troy Rowland.

The NSAC eventually complied, suspending Chavez for just seven months — the shortest suspension ever for that type of infraction.

"Yes," answered Chavez, when asked if he was happy with the commission's decision. "I would love it, of course, as a fighter, if it was not even a one-month suspension. But I know it was difficult."

Chavez failed the NSAC post-fight drug test Nov. 14, after testing positive for Furosemide, a diuretic that can be used by fighters to help cut weight or possibly mask steroid use.

Chavez has never tested positive for steroids nor been suspended before in his professional career.

Suspensions for diuretic infractions generally last seven to eight months, but the commission felt Chavez's circumstances warranted special consideration.

Eight days before fighting on the undercard of the welterweight championship fight between Manny Pacquiao and Miguel Cotto at MGM Grand Garden Arena, Chavez was hospitalized when he became dizzy during a training session.

According to Chavez, he remained hospitalized for 12 hours, during which the medical staff overseeing him pumped glucose and vitamins into his body.

After being released from the hospital, Chavez said he was worried about making the 160-pound weight limit because of the fluids he had received in the hospital and consulted his personal doctor who prescribed him the illegal drug.

Chavez admitted to taking the diuretic once while in the hospital and again the day before the weigh-in, but said he was unaware the drug was illegal.

"I did everything the doctor told me to do," Chavez said. "I had complete trust in my doctor and in what he was giving me. I would take a lot of stuff from him without asking because I had 100 percent trust in him."

While the drug may have helped Chavez make weight the day before the fight, he said it left him feeling sluggish and dehydrated the week of the event.

The 24-year-old fighter went on to admit he had not personally read the medical questionnaire the NSAC requires all participants to read and sign prior to competing in an event.

After arriving late to the weigh-in the day before the fight and still feeling the effects of cutting three final pounds that morning, Chavez said he relied on members of his team to fill out the form, which specifically asked if he had taken any banned substances.

Chavez added he takes full responsibility for his actions and regrets both mistakes.

"I would like to say that I didn't want to hurt anybody," Chavez told the commission. "Second, it was very embarrassing to me when my test came back positive. I have a clean image, and I also have a family name with a clean image in the sport.

"I would never try to take advantage of the participant in front of me. Historically, I've never done anything wrong, but of course I understand the doubt in me because I committed these mistakes."

While several members of the NSAC said they were 'moved' by Chavez's honesty at the meeting, Deputy Attorney General Chris Eccles encouraged the commission to penalize the fighter to the same extent it has in similar cases in the past.

During the deliberations, Eccles made it a point to clarify Chavez understood the purpose of taking the drug by asking him directly if he had done so to make the necessary weight to compete Nov. 14 — to which the fighter responded, 'Yes."

"This illustrates why the use of a diuretic is prohibited," Eccles said. "Chavez's weight was on a roller coaster. Interestingly, he testified he felt overly dehydrated and that he thinks it hurt him.

"I think there is substantial evidence that he took this. He knew the purpose of taking it, and it had the effect of helping him make weight. Based on that, I don't see any reason to deviate from similar remedies ordered in other cases."

In addition to the seven-month suspension, Chavez was fined 10 percent of the $100,000 purse he earned Nov. 14 and the bout was changed to a no-decision.

Promoter Fernando Beltran said Chavez's next fight likely would be in June when the suspension expires, possibly in Las Vegas. A potential opponent mentioned was John Duddy, who is scheduled to fight March 13 in Arlington, Texas.

Brett Okamoto can be reached at 948-7817 or brett.okamoto@lasvegassun.com. Also follow him on twitter: LVSunFighting.

Source: lasvegassun.com

***




Texas: No 'good cause' for drug-testing Pacquiao, Clottey -- Los Angeles Times

By Lance Pugmire, Los Angeles Times

The well-chronicled argument between Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather Jr. over drug testing was so heated and divisive it caused two money-loving athletes to walk away from a guarantee of $25 million each.

Mayweather's camp implied there was something not so natural about Pacquiao's steady move up in weight in recent years, with increased dominance in the ring, and Pacquiao grew so defensive about the jabs that he sued members of the Mayweather camp for defamation.

Now, less than two weeks before Pacquiao fights Joshua Clottey in the replacement fight March 13 at Dallas Cowboys Stadium, the executive director of the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation has judged that there is no "good cause" to institute any pre-fight drug screening for either fighter before their welterweight main event.

Mayweather and Pacquiao's public fireworks over the issue, in which a federal arbitrator was summoned to mediate the argument, have already been considered by the Texas executive director, William Kuntz, said licensing and regulation spokeswoman Susan Stanford.

Stanford added Kuntz can still change his mind "at any time," ordering drug screening procedures that the fighters would need to pay for.

Nevertheless, the absence of testing seems stunning when it's considered that Mayweather's May 1 fight against Pomona's Shane Mosley in Las Vegas is subject to Olympic-style drug testing that is being negotiated to be supervised by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency.

Not only is USADA set to supervise random testing, including blood screening for human growth hormone that last week nabbed a British rugby player, Mayweather will have the option to request additional tests as long as he gives a sample of his own at or near the same time, said his advisor, Leonard Ellerbe, and promoter, Richard Schaefer, said.

Mosley has admitted that in the days before his 2003 mega-fight against Oscar De La Hoya, he used performance-enhancing drugs given him by BALCO founder Victor Conte. Mosley has insisted he thought the substances he took from Conte were legal vitamins.

The disparity in how the Pacquiao and Mayweather fights are being scrutinized (or not) is an unfortunate fact of life in boxing, says the president of the Assn. of Boxing Commissions, the national body that advises state commissions.

"Testing [is] an excellent idea, but the cost of [it is] somewhat cost-prohibitive," Timothy Lueckenhoff said. "If steroid testing is to be done as well as testing for illegal [street] drugs, it must be done across the board. When we talk about requiring all fights to be subject to this, we are just adding more cost to a struggling profession, especially regarding club show events.

"All drug testing is good and needed, but the cost is a huge factor right now."

Source: latimesblogs.latimes.com

***




Boxing, The Healthiest Zombie In The Sports World -- The Sweet Science

By Ron Borges, The Sweet Science

Marshall McLuhan was a Canadian media theorist who coined the phrase “the medium is the message.’’ Hall of Fame promoter Bob Arum believes these days the venue is the message. If he’s right about that then the message is clear – boxing lives!

For decades now the death of boxing has been widely lamented.

It was dead from overexposure.

It was dead from shoddy and sometimes shady decisions.

It was dead because there were too many champions and too few fighters worth of those titles.

It was dead because of inept commissions and corrupt ratings organizations.

It was dead because there were no new stars and few places to develop them.

It was dead because of the Mike Tyson Effect.

Boxing was dead because of the rise of MMA and the UFC phenomenon.

It was dead because it was absent from free TV and mostly missing from the pages of the old media, once known as the newspaper business back when it was a business and not a sinkhole of broken finances.

In sum, boxing has been declared dead more times than Lazarus, yet it remains on its feet and Arum contended last week that the deals he has cut to put on Manny Pacquiao vs. Joshua Clottey at Cowboys Stadium outside of Dallas on March 13 and Miguel Cotto vs. Yuri Foreman in Yankee Stadium on June 5 are a declaration that despite the constant handwringing and predictions that boxing is your grandfather’s sport it is poised to rejoin the debate over how sports fans spend their dollars.

“If we believe- and I certainly believe it - that boxing is a big-time sport, boxing is on a crest,’’ Arum argued forcefully. “Boxing isn’t a niche sport or a dying sport, but it’s a big-time sport and putting it in big stadiums like Cowboys Stadium, like Yankees Stadium, like the new stadium in the Meadowlands, proves that point because when you put your product in venues like that, what you’re saying to the world is that boxing is a big-time sport and can hold its own past any other sport.

“We know what’s happening in Mexico…boxing is getting higher ratings than soccer and certainly any other sport going on regularly on terrestrial TV on a Saturday night. We know it from Germany where arenas are constantly sold out and the ratings are through the roof. We know if from England and the Philippines and Japan. We don’t know it yet from the United States but I’m telling you, it’s like the sleeping giant that is there.

“Boxing in the U.S. will take its place the same way that it is doing in the rest of the world - like a big-time sport. Putting these events in these stadiums will prove that and demonstrate that.’’

The first step in that direction is that the Clottey-Pacquiao fight is close to a 45,000-seat sellout at Cowboy Stadium despite the fact one fighter is from Ghana and the other from the Philippines. Although Pacquiao is considered the pound-for-pound best fighter in the world and hence a huge attraction on his own, Arum is drawing primarily from a Hispanic fan base in Texas so he has created a heavily Hispanic undercard to interest a loyal following for the sport within the Latino community.

That is called marketing, something most promoters think is what you do when you go shopping for groceries but Arum has always embraced. He has long been at the top of that end of the field and unlike many of his competitors he has shifted with the times.

Once he wanted to rule the heavyweights. When they slipped toward Don King and then slipped out of view (and out of the country), he shifted to the welterweights and middleweights and in recent years has gone both to even smaller fighters and to the Latino community, where boxing is a leading attraction.

He has adjusted to changing times and circumstances while others have not, and because of it he’s back at the top of his sport over 30 years after starting there with Muhammad Ali as his main attraction. It’s harder now than it was when Arum first cracked the business but clearly he has done it with the unlikely combination of a Filipino superstar and a primarily Hispanic fan base that he caters to.

In the end, regardless of how he figures to pack more than 40,000 fight fans into a football stadium in Texas and another large crowd into Yankee Stadium in June it is, he believes - and boxing fans should hope – it is all testament to the rebirth of the greatest one-on-one competition in sport - boxing.

“As you will see on March 13, there is no stadium or arena in the world like Cowboys Stadium,’’ Arum said. “What makes the event super exciting is that screen that goes from one 20 yard line to the other and is super high definition. The screen will be 30 feet above the ring. Every replay and every punch in the fight will be seen in really high definition. Indeed, as pretty as the Cowboy cheerleaders are, wait until you see them on that big screen, it is something really special.

“We didn’t set the stadium up for 40,000, we set it up for 45,000 and we are on our way to selling out. There are a lot of Hispanics in Dallas. We are selling a lot of tickets to Hispanics. On the principal undercard bouts we have Hispanics. We have Jose Luis Castillo fighting Alfonso Gomez, John Duddy, who is Irish, fighting Michael Medina, a Mexican from Monterey, middleweight, and David Diaz against Humberto Soto for the WBC lightweight title.

“(The size of the crowd) that’s up to Jerry (Jones, the owner of the Cowboys who offered a $25 million site fee for the failed Pacquiao-Mayweather fight). Right now everyone would have a tremendous view of the fight. We could expand but right now we are on target to sell the 45,000 tickets and we’d be very happy doing that. By the time the fighters get into town, we would have sold well over 40,000 tickets. We would then have 3,000 or 4,000 tickets to go and it would be up to Jerry to expand.

“On the non-televised portion of the card, it is loaded with Hispanics like Roberto Marroquin of Dallas – the Hispanics and Mexicans will be well-represented. Manny Pacquiao has fought many Mexicans and when I was down in Mexico identified Manny as a Filipino/Mexican and the Mexicans in California feel that Manny is one of them.’’

That latter point is typical Arum hyperbole but the larger one he is making is not. Boxing once held many of its biggest fights outdoors because of the crowd demand, but there has been no major outdoor fight at Yankee Stadium since Arum put on Ali vs. Ken Norton in 1976. To return there over 30 years later with Cotto-Foreman is a leap of faith not so much by Arum but by the people who run the new Yankee Stadium and the fans who have been loyal to boxing for so many years, even when the greed and short-sightedness of many of the people running the sport made that difficult.

Yet because of its primal beauty, compelling action when at its best and fundamental appeal, it seems the sport is growing once again in the United States to the point where major stadium fights can now be staged with confidence fans will come. What this all adds up to is one word – hope.

Hope for a sport that has always deserved better than its gotten from the media, from general sports fans and, frankly, from many of the men who have made millions off it.

Source: thesweetscience.com

***