By James Slater, Eastside Boxing
Though fight fans who are anxious to see it happen have been getting, well, anxious, due to how no fresh word has come out regarding what's happening with the prospective Shane Mosley - Floyd Mayweather Junior welterweight super fight, there seems to be no need for concern. Top scribe Kevin Iole of Yahoo Sports, has reported that Richard Schaefer of Golden Boy said on Thursday that "all major deal points have been agreed upon," and that Schaefer said he "hopes to have something to announce in the next couple of days.."
Iole wrote that the fight being announced as official is "imminent," and that a news conference to announce the big fight will likely be held in New York, perhaps even as soon as next week.
It goes without saying that this is great news indeed. Mosley, reportedly agreeing to the Olympic-style blood and urine testing Floyd demanded, unsuccessfully, of Manny Pacquiao, has wanted this fight for a while now - and so, evidently, has Mayweather. Finally, we can look ahead to a genuinely great fight involving the gifted, yet often cautious-about-who-he-fights, Mayweather.
May 1st, at The MGM Grand in Las Vegas, is the date Iole's report speaks of, and if his news is indeed correct, it will be a Mayday to remember for boxing fans. Very possibly a fight that "Money" can lose, the soon-to-be 33-year-old Mayweather will be given credit if he goes ahead with the Mosley challenge - and rightly so. Not only is the bout a major one, but the WBA 147-pound belt currently held by Mosley will also presumably be on the line (not that an alphabelt is needed in this one!)
It could be argued that not since his lightweight days has Mayweather taken such a risky fight. Of course, we have no idea how 38-year-old Mosley's layoff (it will be a layoff of over 15 months come May 1st - Mosley not having fought since ruining Antonio Margarito in Jan. of 2009) will affect his skills, but if "Sugar" is still sweet, he will push Mayweather hard; perhaps harder than anyone else in the pro ranks ever has.
Let's just keep our fingers crossed that nothing goes badly wrong behind the scenes as both sides complete a deal for the May fight, and that this fight comes off. If an official announcement is made next week, fight fans the world over are almost certain to celebrate.
Source: eastsideboxing.com
***
Friday, 29 January 2010
Pacquiao hurts sparring mate -- ABS-CBN News
By Joseph Pimentel, ABS-CBN North America News Bureau
LOS ANGELES, California -- Filipino boxing champ Manny Pacquiao concluded his first day of sparring on Thursday (Friday in Manila) by dominating journeyman boxer Bryan Brooks in four rounds.
“I feel good. I’m very well conditioned. My opponent was big. I did well against him. I’m happy and my coach is happy,” said Pacquiao.
Roach said Pacquiao followed the game plan well during the four-round sparring session. He also said Brooks was hurt a few times while sparring with the pound-for-pound king.
“[Pacquiao] did really well. He’s already following the game plan. This was a good sparring partner for Shane Mosley but I don’t think I’m going to bring him back… he got hurt a few times. Manny was too much for him,” he said.
He added: "Yes, he did whatever he wanted too. He was playing with him a little bit. He likes to play with his audience a little bit … overall, it was a great day."
Pacquiao will be facing Joshua Clottey at the Cowboys Stadium in Dallas, Texas on March 13.
The 7-time world champion is heavily favored to win the bout but Roach is not taking any precautions. He did not allow any media members to film the sparring session or mitt work.
Pacquiao also believes they have their work cut out for them. He said Clottey is a tough, durable opponent. In 39 fights, the boxer from Ghana has never been knocked out.
“Clottey is strong and sturdy. He can take a punch and has a good defense. This is not going to be an easy fight,” said the Filipino.
Roach said that the key to beat Clottey is Pacquiao’s quickness.
“Don’t stand in front of him. Use lateral movement, in-and-outs and side-to-side pretty much because he’s a big strong guy but again boxing ability is going to win this, not size,” said Roach.
If Thursday’s sparring session was an indicator of how the fight will be against Clottey, then Clottey has his work cut out for him.
Source: abs-cbnnews.com
***
LOS ANGELES, California -- Filipino boxing champ Manny Pacquiao concluded his first day of sparring on Thursday (Friday in Manila) by dominating journeyman boxer Bryan Brooks in four rounds.
“I feel good. I’m very well conditioned. My opponent was big. I did well against him. I’m happy and my coach is happy,” said Pacquiao.
Roach said Pacquiao followed the game plan well during the four-round sparring session. He also said Brooks was hurt a few times while sparring with the pound-for-pound king.
“[Pacquiao] did really well. He’s already following the game plan. This was a good sparring partner for Shane Mosley but I don’t think I’m going to bring him back… he got hurt a few times. Manny was too much for him,” he said.
He added: "Yes, he did whatever he wanted too. He was playing with him a little bit. He likes to play with his audience a little bit … overall, it was a great day."
Pacquiao will be facing Joshua Clottey at the Cowboys Stadium in Dallas, Texas on March 13.
The 7-time world champion is heavily favored to win the bout but Roach is not taking any precautions. He did not allow any media members to film the sparring session or mitt work.
Pacquiao also believes they have their work cut out for them. He said Clottey is a tough, durable opponent. In 39 fights, the boxer from Ghana has never been knocked out.
“Clottey is strong and sturdy. He can take a punch and has a good defense. This is not going to be an easy fight,” said the Filipino.
Roach said that the key to beat Clottey is Pacquiao’s quickness.
“Don’t stand in front of him. Use lateral movement, in-and-outs and side-to-side pretty much because he’s a big strong guy but again boxing ability is going to win this, not size,” said Roach.
If Thursday’s sparring session was an indicator of how the fight will be against Clottey, then Clottey has his work cut out for him.
Source: abs-cbnnews.com
***
I'll back Hatton - Haye -- Manchester Evening News
By Trevor Baxter, Manchester Evening News
World heavyweight champion David Haye has backed Ricky Hatton's decision to return to the ring later this year.
And he promises to be ringside when the 'Hitman' pulls on his gloves for the first time since his devastating defeat by Manny Pacquiao last May.
Before then the 29-year-old Londoner defends his WBA belt against Puerto Rican John 'the Quiet Man' Ruiz at the MEN Arena on April 3 in the first world heavyweight title fight in Britain for 10 years.
And he wants Hatton's famous fans to roar him to victory in this mandatory defence after slaying Russian giant Nikolai Valuev in Germany last November.
"I think it's great Ricky has decided to make a comeback," Haye told MEN Sport in an exclusive interview.
"Whatever he feels he needs to do I will support him 100 percent. If he wanted to retire I would support that, too."
And Haye, who will train at Hatton's Hyde gym during the build-up to his Easter Saturday spectacular, added: "If he feels he still has something to give then why not.
"You can be sure that whenever he fights Ricky is going to draw a big crowd.
"He will give a good night's entertainment and the one thing he can count on is me being ringside for that fight."
Haye visited Manchester earlier this week to promote his fight against veteran Ruiz, who lists victory against Evander Holyfield as one of his career highlights. Ruiz also has two defeats by Valuev to his name.
Stunned
Haye hopes for a 20,000 sell-out but will happily spare a seat for the only man to spoil his otherwise perfect career record.
Cheetham Hill's Carl Thompson stunned Haye with a fifth round stoppage at Wembley in 2004.
"I haven't seen Carl since," smiles the Bermondsey-born star. "I will get him some tickets to come down and see the guy he beat defend his heavyweight title.
"It's amazing that he beat me in 2004 but had one more fight and then retired while I went on to win the undisputed cruiserweight championship.
"It seemed that fight was a cross-roads in both of our lives. It's strange he didn't carry on with it and I did. I know he was older but I still feel he had a lot to offer. He proved that by beating me he still had a lot of fight in him."
Haye, who defended his former European title at Altrincham Leisure Centre in July 2006, clearly enjoys his trips to Manchester. "I have been here many times," he acknowledges. "I came to see Mike Tyson's fight against Julius Francis and that was my first real taste of a big arena.
"I was blown away by the fans and the atmosphere. I said to myself I'd love to be top of the bill here one day.
"It seemed a million miles away back then but here I am. Just walking around, I seem to have a lot of fans here."
Ruiz, now 38, is a two-time former world heavyweight champion and has been a professional for 18 years.
His list of wins includes victory over former Manchester star Michael Murray. His only loss in 53 fights came against Kiwi David Tua in 1996.
Ruiz declined a chance to attend Tuesday's press conference, preferring to remain and train in Las Vegas.
Not one to indulge in pre-fight hype, Ruiz has already taken some of Haye's best verbal shots.
"I like to call him a cure for insomnia," goaded the British favourite. "No one wants him because of his style. People in Puerto Rico say he is American and the Americans say he is from Puerto Rico.
"But I'm going to make sure it's the last time they see John Ruiz."
Source: manchestereveningnews.co.uk
World heavyweight champion David Haye has backed Ricky Hatton's decision to return to the ring later this year.
And he promises to be ringside when the 'Hitman' pulls on his gloves for the first time since his devastating defeat by Manny Pacquiao last May.
Before then the 29-year-old Londoner defends his WBA belt against Puerto Rican John 'the Quiet Man' Ruiz at the MEN Arena on April 3 in the first world heavyweight title fight in Britain for 10 years.
And he wants Hatton's famous fans to roar him to victory in this mandatory defence after slaying Russian giant Nikolai Valuev in Germany last November.
"I think it's great Ricky has decided to make a comeback," Haye told MEN Sport in an exclusive interview.
"Whatever he feels he needs to do I will support him 100 percent. If he wanted to retire I would support that, too."
And Haye, who will train at Hatton's Hyde gym during the build-up to his Easter Saturday spectacular, added: "If he feels he still has something to give then why not.
"You can be sure that whenever he fights Ricky is going to draw a big crowd.
"He will give a good night's entertainment and the one thing he can count on is me being ringside for that fight."
Haye visited Manchester earlier this week to promote his fight against veteran Ruiz, who lists victory against Evander Holyfield as one of his career highlights. Ruiz also has two defeats by Valuev to his name.
Stunned
Haye hopes for a 20,000 sell-out but will happily spare a seat for the only man to spoil his otherwise perfect career record.
Cheetham Hill's Carl Thompson stunned Haye with a fifth round stoppage at Wembley in 2004.
"I haven't seen Carl since," smiles the Bermondsey-born star. "I will get him some tickets to come down and see the guy he beat defend his heavyweight title.
"It's amazing that he beat me in 2004 but had one more fight and then retired while I went on to win the undisputed cruiserweight championship.
"It seemed that fight was a cross-roads in both of our lives. It's strange he didn't carry on with it and I did. I know he was older but I still feel he had a lot to offer. He proved that by beating me he still had a lot of fight in him."
Haye, who defended his former European title at Altrincham Leisure Centre in July 2006, clearly enjoys his trips to Manchester. "I have been here many times," he acknowledges. "I came to see Mike Tyson's fight against Julius Francis and that was my first real taste of a big arena.
"I was blown away by the fans and the atmosphere. I said to myself I'd love to be top of the bill here one day.
"It seemed a million miles away back then but here I am. Just walking around, I seem to have a lot of fans here."
Ruiz, now 38, is a two-time former world heavyweight champion and has been a professional for 18 years.
His list of wins includes victory over former Manchester star Michael Murray. His only loss in 53 fights came against Kiwi David Tua in 1996.
Ruiz declined a chance to attend Tuesday's press conference, preferring to remain and train in Las Vegas.
Not one to indulge in pre-fight hype, Ruiz has already taken some of Haye's best verbal shots.
"I like to call him a cure for insomnia," goaded the British favourite. "No one wants him because of his style. People in Puerto Rico say he is American and the Americans say he is from Puerto Rico.
"But I'm going to make sure it's the last time they see John Ruiz."
Source: manchestereveningnews.co.uk
10 questions going into the Pacquiao-Clottey fight -- The Ring
By Michael Rosenthal, The Ring
1. Is Clottey a worthy opponent? Short answer: yes. Pacquiao is THE RING’s No. 1-rated welterweight; Clottey is No. 5. That’s a good matchup. The Ghanian is coming off a loss to Miguel Cotto, one of the most-respected fighters in the world, but some believe he did enough to win a close decision. Clottey has never been knocked out and has good defensive skills, which means he’ll probably survive at least until the late rounds. That said, it’s difficult to get excited about Clottey’s chances or the fighter himself. He’s merely a very good boxer with pretty good power, which won’t be enough to stave off a fierce, quick-handed marvel like Pacquiao. The Filipino is roughly a 4-1 favorite for a reason. And Pacquiao went from Floyd Mayweather Jr. to a relative unknown for his opponent. A drop off that enormous will limit the buzz surrounding the fight.
2. Can Pacquiao hurt Clottey? Pacquiao has faced two welterweights. One, Oscar De La Hoya, could barely fight back. The other, Cotto, doesn’t have the best chin in the world. Clottey is different. The reason he has never been knocked out is he can take a punch. He has proved that over and over again. Thus, there is a very real possibility that the Clottey will remain standing for the full 12 rounds. I don’t see that happening, though. I believe Pacquiao has legitimate welterweight power. Plus, Clottey has never seen this kind of hand speed or punches coming from so many unpredictable directions. The punches that hurt opponents most are the ones they don’t see coming. Pacquiao might not take Clottey out with one punch but an accumulation of them should do the job. If not? Doesn’t matter. Pacquiao will just outbox his inferior foe.
3. Are Pacquiao’s last four victories misleading because of the opposition? Pacquiao supporters will roll their eyes when they read this but it’s a legitimate question. Diaz is good but limited; De La Hoya had nothing left; Hatton was overrated and some will argue that Cotto never fully recovered from the beating he took from Margarito. So what does that say about Pacquiao? Not much. As his trainer, Freddie Roach, has pointed out, we thought these opponents were all pretty good going into their meetings with Pacquiao. It was afterward, for the most part, that we began to question to them. Clottey might actually be the most-difficult to criticize even after the fact because he has had a fine career and has shown no signs of decline. Still, some will find serious fault with him and anyone else Pacquiao fights short of Mayweather or Mosley. The bottom line is that he’s destroying whomever they put in front of him. Let’s enjoy it.
4. Has Pacquiao’s reputation taken a hit after the failed negotiations with Mayweather? I don’t think so. Most fans seemed to blame Mayweather for the impasse, insisting that he was out of line to make blood-testing demands outside normal protocol even though Pacquiao has never failed a drug test. I also don’t think many people believe he has taken performance-enhancing drugs. Most adhere to the innocent-until-proven-guilty philosophy, which is the only fair approach to take. Undoubtedly, a small percentage feel strongly that he should’ve taken the blood test two weeks before the fight if he had nothing to hide. And a smaller percentage, those convinced he couldn’t have such success at heavier weights without some help, will accuse Pacquiao of wrong doing. That’s a very small group, though. He is relatively unscathed.
5. Will Pacquiao suffer a letdown after his epic showdown with Mayweather fell through? Not a chance. Pacquiao is the most-focused, most-professional boxer I’ve ever seen in spite of myriad distractions. In part, that’s just how he is. He is so committed that he left his homeland and traveled halfway around the world seeking a good trainer simply because he wanted to tap into what he knew was vast potential. The fact he has the hopes and dreams of an entire nation on his shoulders also is an immensely powerful motivating factor. He knows too much is riding on every fight to let down. And even if he were to slip up, Roach would be there to give him a good kick in the behind. Pacquiao will be as ready as ever on March 13.
6. Could Pacquiao’s demanding schedule the past few years catch up to him? Pacquiao, 31, hasn’t had a particularly hard fight since the rematch with Juan Manuel Marquez in March of 2008. He cruised past David Diaz, Oscar De La Hoya, Ricky Hatton and Miguel Cotto, although the first few rounds against Cotto were brutal. However, Pacquiao, one of the hardest workers in the world, has been training diligently to perfect his craft for 15 years without a significant break. That includes countless sparring sessions in which he has absorbed considerable punishment. Also, no one has a more hectic and demanding personal schedule than the Filipino idol. It’s not farfetched to wonder whether all of the above will take a toll on him at some point.
7. How many people will attend the fight at the new Cowboys Stadium in Dallas? An estimated 20,000 tickets were sold the first day they were available. That’s probably a tribute to Pacquiao’s growing popularity in the U.S., a large number of boxing-friendly Latinos in the Dallas area, a strong sports culture in Texas and the novelty of the first boxing card there. The stadium reportedly will be configured for 45,000 seats. I doubt that many people will buy tickets but I won’t be surprised to see a large crowd. I suspect the atmosphere will be festive but those in attendance shouldn’t necessarily expect electricity. I attended the Wladimir Klitschko-Ruslan Chagaev fight at a packed 60,000-seat soccer stadium in Germany and the energy dwindled to nothing when it became clear that Klitschko was going to win easily. Then again, the 126,000-seat Estadio Azteca in Mexico City rocked throughout the Julio Cesar Chavez-Greg Haugen fight.
8. How many pay-per-view buys will the fight generate? Pacquiao-Mayweather, featuring the two biggest pay-per-view draws in the U.S., might’ve smashed records by generating a record 3 million-plus buys. Pacquiao-Clottey? I think 800,000-900,000 –- or just shy of the 1 million Pacquiao-Cotto drew -- is realistic. Clottey isn’t nearly the attraction Cotto is in part because he doesn’t have a Latino fan base in the U.S. However, the fascination with Pacquiao is still growing and the unusual venue -– Cowboys Stadium -– adds to the appeal of the event. Plus, Antonio Margarito’s return from suspension would give the show a significant bump if he receives a license in Texas.
9. What if Pacquiao wins? Bob Arum, Pacquiao’s promoter, has come up with a fascinating plan to have his star attraction fight Antonio Margarito this year if the disgraced Mexican fighter receives a license in Texas. That would be a very lucrative matchup. The fact Margarito would be returning from his suspension in California –- for illegal hand wraps -– and a large following among Mexicans and Mexican-Americans would make him a hot commodity and the fight much more attractive than Pacquiao-Clottey. Thus, we might be looking at 2011 for the Pacquiao-Mayweather showdown. That’s assuming neither of the star participants slips up in the meantime and can get past blood-testing issues in the end.
10. What if Clottey wins? A Clottey victory would turn the boxing world upside down. Suddenly, the sport’s most-popular figure would be exposed as human after all and lose the remarkable momentum that has experts comparing him to the greatest fighters of all time. The landscape would be far less interesting, to say the least. Pacquiao would remain an attraction –- particularly if he could beat Clottey in a rematch -– but he probably would never be quite the same. Pacquiao-Mayweather or Pacquiao-Mosley would still be big but, with a diminished Pacquiao, wouldn’t smash pay-per-view records. Clottey would set himself up for some healthy paydays but will never be a true star. This is fantasy, though: Clottey isn’t going to win.
Michael Rosenthal can be reached at RingTVeditor@yahoo.com
Source: ringtv.com
***
1. Is Clottey a worthy opponent? Short answer: yes. Pacquiao is THE RING’s No. 1-rated welterweight; Clottey is No. 5. That’s a good matchup. The Ghanian is coming off a loss to Miguel Cotto, one of the most-respected fighters in the world, but some believe he did enough to win a close decision. Clottey has never been knocked out and has good defensive skills, which means he’ll probably survive at least until the late rounds. That said, it’s difficult to get excited about Clottey’s chances or the fighter himself. He’s merely a very good boxer with pretty good power, which won’t be enough to stave off a fierce, quick-handed marvel like Pacquiao. The Filipino is roughly a 4-1 favorite for a reason. And Pacquiao went from Floyd Mayweather Jr. to a relative unknown for his opponent. A drop off that enormous will limit the buzz surrounding the fight.
2. Can Pacquiao hurt Clottey? Pacquiao has faced two welterweights. One, Oscar De La Hoya, could barely fight back. The other, Cotto, doesn’t have the best chin in the world. Clottey is different. The reason he has never been knocked out is he can take a punch. He has proved that over and over again. Thus, there is a very real possibility that the Clottey will remain standing for the full 12 rounds. I don’t see that happening, though. I believe Pacquiao has legitimate welterweight power. Plus, Clottey has never seen this kind of hand speed or punches coming from so many unpredictable directions. The punches that hurt opponents most are the ones they don’t see coming. Pacquiao might not take Clottey out with one punch but an accumulation of them should do the job. If not? Doesn’t matter. Pacquiao will just outbox his inferior foe.
3. Are Pacquiao’s last four victories misleading because of the opposition? Pacquiao supporters will roll their eyes when they read this but it’s a legitimate question. Diaz is good but limited; De La Hoya had nothing left; Hatton was overrated and some will argue that Cotto never fully recovered from the beating he took from Margarito. So what does that say about Pacquiao? Not much. As his trainer, Freddie Roach, has pointed out, we thought these opponents were all pretty good going into their meetings with Pacquiao. It was afterward, for the most part, that we began to question to them. Clottey might actually be the most-difficult to criticize even after the fact because he has had a fine career and has shown no signs of decline. Still, some will find serious fault with him and anyone else Pacquiao fights short of Mayweather or Mosley. The bottom line is that he’s destroying whomever they put in front of him. Let’s enjoy it.
4. Has Pacquiao’s reputation taken a hit after the failed negotiations with Mayweather? I don’t think so. Most fans seemed to blame Mayweather for the impasse, insisting that he was out of line to make blood-testing demands outside normal protocol even though Pacquiao has never failed a drug test. I also don’t think many people believe he has taken performance-enhancing drugs. Most adhere to the innocent-until-proven-guilty philosophy, which is the only fair approach to take. Undoubtedly, a small percentage feel strongly that he should’ve taken the blood test two weeks before the fight if he had nothing to hide. And a smaller percentage, those convinced he couldn’t have such success at heavier weights without some help, will accuse Pacquiao of wrong doing. That’s a very small group, though. He is relatively unscathed.
5. Will Pacquiao suffer a letdown after his epic showdown with Mayweather fell through? Not a chance. Pacquiao is the most-focused, most-professional boxer I’ve ever seen in spite of myriad distractions. In part, that’s just how he is. He is so committed that he left his homeland and traveled halfway around the world seeking a good trainer simply because he wanted to tap into what he knew was vast potential. The fact he has the hopes and dreams of an entire nation on his shoulders also is an immensely powerful motivating factor. He knows too much is riding on every fight to let down. And even if he were to slip up, Roach would be there to give him a good kick in the behind. Pacquiao will be as ready as ever on March 13.
6. Could Pacquiao’s demanding schedule the past few years catch up to him? Pacquiao, 31, hasn’t had a particularly hard fight since the rematch with Juan Manuel Marquez in March of 2008. He cruised past David Diaz, Oscar De La Hoya, Ricky Hatton and Miguel Cotto, although the first few rounds against Cotto were brutal. However, Pacquiao, one of the hardest workers in the world, has been training diligently to perfect his craft for 15 years without a significant break. That includes countless sparring sessions in which he has absorbed considerable punishment. Also, no one has a more hectic and demanding personal schedule than the Filipino idol. It’s not farfetched to wonder whether all of the above will take a toll on him at some point.
7. How many people will attend the fight at the new Cowboys Stadium in Dallas? An estimated 20,000 tickets were sold the first day they were available. That’s probably a tribute to Pacquiao’s growing popularity in the U.S., a large number of boxing-friendly Latinos in the Dallas area, a strong sports culture in Texas and the novelty of the first boxing card there. The stadium reportedly will be configured for 45,000 seats. I doubt that many people will buy tickets but I won’t be surprised to see a large crowd. I suspect the atmosphere will be festive but those in attendance shouldn’t necessarily expect electricity. I attended the Wladimir Klitschko-Ruslan Chagaev fight at a packed 60,000-seat soccer stadium in Germany and the energy dwindled to nothing when it became clear that Klitschko was going to win easily. Then again, the 126,000-seat Estadio Azteca in Mexico City rocked throughout the Julio Cesar Chavez-Greg Haugen fight.
8. How many pay-per-view buys will the fight generate? Pacquiao-Mayweather, featuring the two biggest pay-per-view draws in the U.S., might’ve smashed records by generating a record 3 million-plus buys. Pacquiao-Clottey? I think 800,000-900,000 –- or just shy of the 1 million Pacquiao-Cotto drew -- is realistic. Clottey isn’t nearly the attraction Cotto is in part because he doesn’t have a Latino fan base in the U.S. However, the fascination with Pacquiao is still growing and the unusual venue -– Cowboys Stadium -– adds to the appeal of the event. Plus, Antonio Margarito’s return from suspension would give the show a significant bump if he receives a license in Texas.
9. What if Pacquiao wins? Bob Arum, Pacquiao’s promoter, has come up with a fascinating plan to have his star attraction fight Antonio Margarito this year if the disgraced Mexican fighter receives a license in Texas. That would be a very lucrative matchup. The fact Margarito would be returning from his suspension in California –- for illegal hand wraps -– and a large following among Mexicans and Mexican-Americans would make him a hot commodity and the fight much more attractive than Pacquiao-Clottey. Thus, we might be looking at 2011 for the Pacquiao-Mayweather showdown. That’s assuming neither of the star participants slips up in the meantime and can get past blood-testing issues in the end.
10. What if Clottey wins? A Clottey victory would turn the boxing world upside down. Suddenly, the sport’s most-popular figure would be exposed as human after all and lose the remarkable momentum that has experts comparing him to the greatest fighters of all time. The landscape would be far less interesting, to say the least. Pacquiao would remain an attraction –- particularly if he could beat Clottey in a rematch -– but he probably would never be quite the same. Pacquiao-Mayweather or Pacquiao-Mosley would still be big but, with a diminished Pacquiao, wouldn’t smash pay-per-view records. Clottey would set himself up for some healthy paydays but will never be a true star. This is fantasy, though: Clottey isn’t going to win.
Michael Rosenthal can be reached at RingTVeditor@yahoo.com
Source: ringtv.com
***
Aging action star Van Damme, 49, still wants a pro fight -- Yahoo! Sports
By Steve Cofield, Yahoo! Sports
Jean Claude Van Damme could whip anybody. Throw in one caveat -- on the silver screen. Now the 49-year-old Belgian star of dozens of action films wants to show he can do it for real.
Repeating what he said in September, Van Damme is trying to land a professional kickboxing match against former Olympian Somluck Kamsing in Macau as the capper to a proposed reality show. During a press conference in Ukraine (VIDEO), Van Damme explained his motivation.
"[It's] dangerous but life is short," said Van Damme. "I want to prove to young people and even to mature people that a man can go into some very strong physical effort and training, and also be a movie star."
The fight was originally slated for a March K-1 event in Las Vegas. As Cagewriter told you at the time, the fight had zero chance of coming off in Nevada:
Kamsing, 35, was the 1996 Olympic Gold medalist in boxing at 126 pounds. He also fought in the 2000 and 2004 Olympics, losing to Rocky Juarez and Benoit Gaudet, respectively ... we'll rain on the parade with a reality check, the Nevada State Athletic Commission would never approve a fight with the [49-year-old] Jean Claude facing a former Olympian.
We nailed it. Van Damme got word that the fight could not go down in the U.S. as many states have strict guidelines for fighters over 35.
Randy Couture, 46, will fight 45-year-old Mark Coleman next week in Las Vegas in the main event of UFC 109. Along with 37-year-old Frank Trigg and 35-year-old Matt Serra, Couture and Coleman had to go in front of the NSAC to undergo neurological testing and gain approval to fight. Vam Damme has zero professional fights. The four UFC fighters have a combined 93 pro fights and were still scrutinized before they were given their licenses. The only "real" fight we know of for Van Damme was a rumored scrap against fellow action star Chuck Zito.
For Van Damme, fighting a former Olympian is a brave thing to attempt, but let's hope it's closer to a reality show fight than one where he may get injured badly.
Source: sports.yahoo.com
Jean Claude Van Damme could whip anybody. Throw in one caveat -- on the silver screen. Now the 49-year-old Belgian star of dozens of action films wants to show he can do it for real.
Repeating what he said in September, Van Damme is trying to land a professional kickboxing match against former Olympian Somluck Kamsing in Macau as the capper to a proposed reality show. During a press conference in Ukraine (VIDEO), Van Damme explained his motivation.
"[It's] dangerous but life is short," said Van Damme. "I want to prove to young people and even to mature people that a man can go into some very strong physical effort and training, and also be a movie star."
The fight was originally slated for a March K-1 event in Las Vegas. As Cagewriter told you at the time, the fight had zero chance of coming off in Nevada:
Kamsing, 35, was the 1996 Olympic Gold medalist in boxing at 126 pounds. He also fought in the 2000 and 2004 Olympics, losing to Rocky Juarez and Benoit Gaudet, respectively ... we'll rain on the parade with a reality check, the Nevada State Athletic Commission would never approve a fight with the [49-year-old] Jean Claude facing a former Olympian.
We nailed it. Van Damme got word that the fight could not go down in the U.S. as many states have strict guidelines for fighters over 35.
Randy Couture, 46, will fight 45-year-old Mark Coleman next week in Las Vegas in the main event of UFC 109. Along with 37-year-old Frank Trigg and 35-year-old Matt Serra, Couture and Coleman had to go in front of the NSAC to undergo neurological testing and gain approval to fight. Vam Damme has zero professional fights. The four UFC fighters have a combined 93 pro fights and were still scrutinized before they were given their licenses. The only "real" fight we know of for Van Damme was a rumored scrap against fellow action star Chuck Zito.
For Van Damme, fighting a former Olympian is a brave thing to attempt, but let's hope it's closer to a reality show fight than one where he may get injured badly.
Source: sports.yahoo.com
Flomos go into orgasmic flight as Mayweather accepts Mosley -- Examiner
By Michael Marley, Examiner.com
Flomos are about to go into orgasmic flight.
Finally, they are about to have some news to slightly fend off the Paclanders and all the others with their childish Duckweather and Fraudweather namecalling.
L'il Floyd is taking a big fight, he's accepting the call of Sugar Shane Mosley for the All American Matchup and, even though Mosley is edging age 40, it's no mismatch along the lines of Mayweather's 12 round playtime with too small, that's all urine imbiber Juan Manuel Marquez.
Mosley is a crafty, full-fledged welterweight. Seeing the Andre Berto bout, which would have taken place this Saturday night go bye bye, was a good thing for the Shanester.
There was the possibility that Berto could lose but still make Mosley look bad. Or they both could have committed excessive holding and produced a boring bout.
Now Mosley gets much more money and a tougher challenge. Can he take the precious "0" off Mayweather's pro record.
Guess we'll find out May 1 or May 8.
Golden Boy has made an "in house" match just like Top Rank did in making Manny Pacquiao-Joshua Clottey for March 13.
No promotional firm should take any bows for making an "in house" match.
Now can these kids play nice and match the May winner against the March winner?
Well, let me ask you this, you Mayweather knockers.
So many of you said he would perpetually avoid Mosley and now he's running to him rather than in the opposite direction.
I'd like to ramble on but I've got to rush out and get my random blood test, you know.
Reliable Kevin Iole, he's no Yahoo from Yahoo.com, was told by ex-Swiss banker Richie Rich Schaefer that all "major points" have been agreed to by both fighters and that a New York press conference may take place next week.
No word on urine and blood testing requirements for the media.
(mlcmarley@aol.com)
Source: examiner.com
***
Flomos are about to go into orgasmic flight.
Finally, they are about to have some news to slightly fend off the Paclanders and all the others with their childish Duckweather and Fraudweather namecalling.
L'il Floyd is taking a big fight, he's accepting the call of Sugar Shane Mosley for the All American Matchup and, even though Mosley is edging age 40, it's no mismatch along the lines of Mayweather's 12 round playtime with too small, that's all urine imbiber Juan Manuel Marquez.
Mosley is a crafty, full-fledged welterweight. Seeing the Andre Berto bout, which would have taken place this Saturday night go bye bye, was a good thing for the Shanester.
There was the possibility that Berto could lose but still make Mosley look bad. Or they both could have committed excessive holding and produced a boring bout.
Now Mosley gets much more money and a tougher challenge. Can he take the precious "0" off Mayweather's pro record.
Guess we'll find out May 1 or May 8.
Golden Boy has made an "in house" match just like Top Rank did in making Manny Pacquiao-Joshua Clottey for March 13.
No promotional firm should take any bows for making an "in house" match.
Now can these kids play nice and match the May winner against the March winner?
Well, let me ask you this, you Mayweather knockers.
So many of you said he would perpetually avoid Mosley and now he's running to him rather than in the opposite direction.
I'd like to ramble on but I've got to rush out and get my random blood test, you know.
Reliable Kevin Iole, he's no Yahoo from Yahoo.com, was told by ex-Swiss banker Richie Rich Schaefer that all "major points" have been agreed to by both fighters and that a New York press conference may take place next week.
No word on urine and blood testing requirements for the media.
(mlcmarley@aol.com)
Source: examiner.com
***
Hatton should listen to Lou and quit now -- The Sun
By COLIN HART, The Sun
LOU DiBELLA has set an excellent example to those irresponsible individuals shamefully encouraging Ricky Hatton to make a comeback.
DiBella, a prominent American promoter and manager, steered Jermain Taylor to the world middleweight title.
The slick boxer from Little Rock, Arkansas, reigned for five years before he was beaten by Kelly Pavlik.
Since then Taylor, 31, has rapidly fallen apart. He has lost four of his last five fights and been knocked out three times. Last year his two defeats against Carl Froch and Arthur Abrahams left him severely concussed.
That set off alarm bells with DiBella, who was so anxious about Taylor's health and future well-being, he decided to walk away from him.
In a statement, DiBella said: "It is my belief the continuation of Jermain's career as an active fighter places him at unnecessary risk.
"I cannot, in conscience, remain involved, given my assessment of such a risk.
"Jermain is not only a great fighter but a good and decent man with a wonderful family.
"It is out of genuine concern for him and his family I'm compelled to make this decision."
Taylor may have sensibly pulled out of his April date with Andre Ward as part of the Super Six tournament that Froch is involved in but he has not announced his retirement.
DiBella is to be applauded for not only taking the action he has but going public with his fears. He may not be a consultant neurologist but DiBella certainly knows a shot fighter when he sees one.
And, like so many of boxing's most influential personalities, DiBella places Hatton firmly in that category.
He told me if he was involved with Hatton he would refuse to be a party to the boxer returning to the ring this spring.
Lou said: "I like and admire Ricky because he is a true warrior but his time has been and gone for good. It would be seriously unwise if he insists on having one more fight, whoever it's against.
"He is an intelligent guy so must be aware of the terrible danger he'd be putting himself in.
"Surely there must be someone capable of making him see sense?
"If only those close to Muhammad Ali near the end of his career had decided to leave him perhaps he wouldn't be in the dreadful state he's in today."
DiBella is voicing the opinions of so many of the boxing brotherhood, who firmly believe Hatton must be saved from himself.
You don't have to know a left hook from a coat hook to realise Hatton's reflexes and punch resistance had evaporated long before Manny Pacquiao poleaxed him eight months ago.
Anyone who saw Hatton interviewed on Sky a couple of weeks ago must have thought he looked more like a publican than a pugilist.
Shedding several stone to once more get him down to the 10st light-welterweight limit will present Hatton with its own hazards.
Some extremely powerful figures have pleaded with him to change his mind.
Jose Sulaiman, WBC president, doesn't want Hatton to fight again.
Sulaiman has never called for a fighter to retire in more than 30 years in office. British Board secretary Robert Smith agrees.
Others who want Hatton to play safe are Barry McGuigan, Joe Calzaghe, Floyd Mayweather Jnr, Amir Khan, Billy Graham, Floyd Mayweather Snr and Freddie Roach.
And almost the entire boxing media can be added to that list. We can't all be wrong Ricky.
Source: thesun.co.uk
LOU DiBELLA has set an excellent example to those irresponsible individuals shamefully encouraging Ricky Hatton to make a comeback.
DiBella, a prominent American promoter and manager, steered Jermain Taylor to the world middleweight title.
The slick boxer from Little Rock, Arkansas, reigned for five years before he was beaten by Kelly Pavlik.
Since then Taylor, 31, has rapidly fallen apart. He has lost four of his last five fights and been knocked out three times. Last year his two defeats against Carl Froch and Arthur Abrahams left him severely concussed.
That set off alarm bells with DiBella, who was so anxious about Taylor's health and future well-being, he decided to walk away from him.
In a statement, DiBella said: "It is my belief the continuation of Jermain's career as an active fighter places him at unnecessary risk.
"I cannot, in conscience, remain involved, given my assessment of such a risk.
"Jermain is not only a great fighter but a good and decent man with a wonderful family.
"It is out of genuine concern for him and his family I'm compelled to make this decision."
Taylor may have sensibly pulled out of his April date with Andre Ward as part of the Super Six tournament that Froch is involved in but he has not announced his retirement.
DiBella is to be applauded for not only taking the action he has but going public with his fears. He may not be a consultant neurologist but DiBella certainly knows a shot fighter when he sees one.
And, like so many of boxing's most influential personalities, DiBella places Hatton firmly in that category.
He told me if he was involved with Hatton he would refuse to be a party to the boxer returning to the ring this spring.
Lou said: "I like and admire Ricky because he is a true warrior but his time has been and gone for good. It would be seriously unwise if he insists on having one more fight, whoever it's against.
"He is an intelligent guy so must be aware of the terrible danger he'd be putting himself in.
"Surely there must be someone capable of making him see sense?
"If only those close to Muhammad Ali near the end of his career had decided to leave him perhaps he wouldn't be in the dreadful state he's in today."
DiBella is voicing the opinions of so many of the boxing brotherhood, who firmly believe Hatton must be saved from himself.
You don't have to know a left hook from a coat hook to realise Hatton's reflexes and punch resistance had evaporated long before Manny Pacquiao poleaxed him eight months ago.
Anyone who saw Hatton interviewed on Sky a couple of weeks ago must have thought he looked more like a publican than a pugilist.
Shedding several stone to once more get him down to the 10st light-welterweight limit will present Hatton with its own hazards.
Some extremely powerful figures have pleaded with him to change his mind.
Jose Sulaiman, WBC president, doesn't want Hatton to fight again.
Sulaiman has never called for a fighter to retire in more than 30 years in office. British Board secretary Robert Smith agrees.
Others who want Hatton to play safe are Barry McGuigan, Joe Calzaghe, Floyd Mayweather Jnr, Amir Khan, Billy Graham, Floyd Mayweather Snr and Freddie Roach.
And almost the entire boxing media can be added to that list. We can't all be wrong Ricky.
Source: thesun.co.uk
Victor Conte slams professional boxing's drug testing -- BBC Sport
BBC Sport
Victor Conte, the man who provided disgraced sprinter Dwain Chambers' with illegal drugs, has branded boxing's attempts to catch cheats as "inept".
Currently working with professional boxers, Conte claims drug use in the sport is rife due to lax regulation.
"The testing that is being utilised in boxing is virtually worthless," Conte told BBC Radio 5 Live.
Conte's view is backed up by the World Anti Doping Agency (Wada) which branded boxing's testing as "pathetic".
Professional boxing is one the few sports that is not regulated by a single governing body.
In the United States each commission has different rules when it comes to drug testing, with the Nevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC) responsible for regulating the Mayweather-Pacquiao fight as it was to take place in Las Vegas.
That hotch-potch approach is unlike the amateur game which is under the Wada umbrella.
"Professional boxing is not in compliance and has made no effort to comply," said head of Wada David Howman.
"They give the boxer every opportunity to hide what they may have taken previously and that is not the way the world operates these days.
The concern is that boxers could be resorting to taking human growth hormone drugs (HGH) to aid their move up and down the weight divisions.
"I don't believe they want to know how rampant the use of drugs really is. Testing in boxing is completely and totally inept," said Conte.
The founder of the Bay Area Laboratory Co-operative also fears that testosterone is being used to aid the intensity of training and improve speed and power as well as Erythropoietin (EPO) to increase oxygen intake and the ability to recover more quickly after training.
Boxing is still reeling from the cancellation of the biggest payday in its history because of a drugs testing dispute.
Unbeaten American Floyd Mayweather's proposed fight with Filipino superstar Manny Pacquiao had been set for 13 March.
But the fight was called off after Mayweather's management wanted both men - regarded as the two best pound-for-pound fighters in the world - to submit to blood-testing 14 days prior to the bout.
Pacquiao, however, refused saying that he had difficulty with taking blood, and after days of negotiating the pair failed to resolve their dispute.
The key to Wada's supervisory regime is its ability to test randomly.
Extraordinarily Britain's Olympic gold medallist James DeGale has yet to have a drugs test - other than the one given at the yearly medical check - since turning professional after the Beijing Games in 2008.
"As a top amateur you were tested regularly," DeGale told BBC Sport.
"It was random - they can turn up day and night. Leading up to the Olympics I was tested twice randomly and when I won gold I had a blood and urine test.
"It's pretty strict, you don't know when you are going to get tested. Joe Murray got tested five times randomly. It's good."
With such sporadic testing, Conte believes it is far too easy to avoid detection.
"They test you before a fight and after a fight," said Conte.
"One for performance-enhancing drugs and one for recreational drugs, but these athletes have advisors who understand that all you have to do is taper off the different species of drugs.
"Until those who control the majority of the financial gain from boxing develop a true and genuine interest in reducing the use of performance enhancing drugs, it will continue to be rampant."
Conte, who provided drugs for five-time Olympic gold medallist Marion Jones, developed the banned steroid tetrahydrogestrinone (THG) with the help of bodybuilding chemist Patrick Arnold.
Caught in 2003, with the Balco laboratory shut down, Conte was later sentenced to four months in prison.
He has since helped Wada go about catching drugs cheats and under his new company Scientific Nutrition for Advanced Conditioning provides legal supplements for current athletes.
His clients are among others boxers Andre Ward (who is part of the Super Six series that includes Britain's Carl Froch) and Eddie Chambers (who is set to fight Wladimir Klitschko in March).
"I would say a good cut off would be random for the two months before a fight and up to five days before the fight," said Conte.
Howman is hoping the Mayweather-Pacquiao furore will provide a wake-up call for boxing.
"The sort of pressure that was imposed by Mayweather recently will hopefully gather some momentum," said Wada's chief.
"We would have thought they would have wanted to be part of the drug-testing programme that United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) has and it would have shown that the boxers were clean and were prepared to fight clean."
He added: "Wada's view is quite simple, what professional boxing has in place is well short of the mark.
"The difficulty with professional boxing is that they regard themselves as private entities and outside of our jurisdiction. Largely because they reside in the United States where there is no government control and Olympic committee control."
In the past the professional game has taken a softly-softly approach to punishing boxers.
In 2000 a post-fight drug test showed that the then IBF, WBC and WBA light-heavyweight world champion Roy Jones Jr and his opponent Richard Hall both tested positive for androstenedione, which is a banned substance by the IBF. Jones was able to keep his titles and was not fined or suspended for the positive test by the IBF.
In 2005 American James Toney defeat John Ruiz by a unanimous decision to win the WBA heavyweight title but later failed his post-fight drug test, testing positive for the anabolic steroid stanozolol. Toney only received a 90-day ban.
The Commissioner of Indiana Boxing, Jacob Hall, insisted that Indiana did not have a law on drug testing and that an agreement was made with Jones to send his next two pre-fight drug tests to the Indiana commission.
However, German promoter Chris Meyer, who manages former heavyweight world champion Nikolay Valuev, believes that improving drug testing is vital to boxing's survival.
Meyer operates a "zero-tolerance policy" towards doping - a stance that earlier in the month cost Spanish boxer Pablo Navascus the chance to face Sebastian Sylvester for the IBF middleweight title after the Spaniard failed a dope test during training.
"No insurance covers that and it's a big problem," said Meyer. "But we are prepared to take this risk."
Meyer added: "If you are an amateur athlete there is no discussion about this."
"We have to demonstrate to the public that we do not cheat - we play with open cards. It's important for the survival of the sport.
"Perhaps in the long run the Mayweather-Pacquiao situation will be good for boxing."
Interviews by BBC Radio 5 Live boxing correspondent Mike Costello. Writing by broadcast journalist Nabil Hassan
Source: news.bbc.co.uk
Victor Conte, the man who provided disgraced sprinter Dwain Chambers' with illegal drugs, has branded boxing's attempts to catch cheats as "inept".
Currently working with professional boxers, Conte claims drug use in the sport is rife due to lax regulation.
"The testing that is being utilised in boxing is virtually worthless," Conte told BBC Radio 5 Live.
Conte's view is backed up by the World Anti Doping Agency (Wada) which branded boxing's testing as "pathetic".
Professional boxing is one the few sports that is not regulated by a single governing body.
In the United States each commission has different rules when it comes to drug testing, with the Nevada State Athletic Commission (NSAC) responsible for regulating the Mayweather-Pacquiao fight as it was to take place in Las Vegas.
That hotch-potch approach is unlike the amateur game which is under the Wada umbrella.
"Professional boxing is not in compliance and has made no effort to comply," said head of Wada David Howman.
"They give the boxer every opportunity to hide what they may have taken previously and that is not the way the world operates these days.
The concern is that boxers could be resorting to taking human growth hormone drugs (HGH) to aid their move up and down the weight divisions.
"I don't believe they want to know how rampant the use of drugs really is. Testing in boxing is completely and totally inept," said Conte.
The founder of the Bay Area Laboratory Co-operative also fears that testosterone is being used to aid the intensity of training and improve speed and power as well as Erythropoietin (EPO) to increase oxygen intake and the ability to recover more quickly after training.
Boxing is still reeling from the cancellation of the biggest payday in its history because of a drugs testing dispute.
Unbeaten American Floyd Mayweather's proposed fight with Filipino superstar Manny Pacquiao had been set for 13 March.
But the fight was called off after Mayweather's management wanted both men - regarded as the two best pound-for-pound fighters in the world - to submit to blood-testing 14 days prior to the bout.
Pacquiao, however, refused saying that he had difficulty with taking blood, and after days of negotiating the pair failed to resolve their dispute.
The key to Wada's supervisory regime is its ability to test randomly.
Extraordinarily Britain's Olympic gold medallist James DeGale has yet to have a drugs test - other than the one given at the yearly medical check - since turning professional after the Beijing Games in 2008.
"As a top amateur you were tested regularly," DeGale told BBC Sport.
"It was random - they can turn up day and night. Leading up to the Olympics I was tested twice randomly and when I won gold I had a blood and urine test.
"It's pretty strict, you don't know when you are going to get tested. Joe Murray got tested five times randomly. It's good."
With such sporadic testing, Conte believes it is far too easy to avoid detection.
"They test you before a fight and after a fight," said Conte.
"One for performance-enhancing drugs and one for recreational drugs, but these athletes have advisors who understand that all you have to do is taper off the different species of drugs.
"Until those who control the majority of the financial gain from boxing develop a true and genuine interest in reducing the use of performance enhancing drugs, it will continue to be rampant."
Conte, who provided drugs for five-time Olympic gold medallist Marion Jones, developed the banned steroid tetrahydrogestrinone (THG) with the help of bodybuilding chemist Patrick Arnold.
Caught in 2003, with the Balco laboratory shut down, Conte was later sentenced to four months in prison.
He has since helped Wada go about catching drugs cheats and under his new company Scientific Nutrition for Advanced Conditioning provides legal supplements for current athletes.
His clients are among others boxers Andre Ward (who is part of the Super Six series that includes Britain's Carl Froch) and Eddie Chambers (who is set to fight Wladimir Klitschko in March).
"I would say a good cut off would be random for the two months before a fight and up to five days before the fight," said Conte.
Howman is hoping the Mayweather-Pacquiao furore will provide a wake-up call for boxing.
"The sort of pressure that was imposed by Mayweather recently will hopefully gather some momentum," said Wada's chief.
"We would have thought they would have wanted to be part of the drug-testing programme that United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) has and it would have shown that the boxers were clean and were prepared to fight clean."
He added: "Wada's view is quite simple, what professional boxing has in place is well short of the mark.
"The difficulty with professional boxing is that they regard themselves as private entities and outside of our jurisdiction. Largely because they reside in the United States where there is no government control and Olympic committee control."
In the past the professional game has taken a softly-softly approach to punishing boxers.
In 2000 a post-fight drug test showed that the then IBF, WBC and WBA light-heavyweight world champion Roy Jones Jr and his opponent Richard Hall both tested positive for androstenedione, which is a banned substance by the IBF. Jones was able to keep his titles and was not fined or suspended for the positive test by the IBF.
In 2005 American James Toney defeat John Ruiz by a unanimous decision to win the WBA heavyweight title but later failed his post-fight drug test, testing positive for the anabolic steroid stanozolol. Toney only received a 90-day ban.
The Commissioner of Indiana Boxing, Jacob Hall, insisted that Indiana did not have a law on drug testing and that an agreement was made with Jones to send his next two pre-fight drug tests to the Indiana commission.
However, German promoter Chris Meyer, who manages former heavyweight world champion Nikolay Valuev, believes that improving drug testing is vital to boxing's survival.
Meyer operates a "zero-tolerance policy" towards doping - a stance that earlier in the month cost Spanish boxer Pablo Navascus the chance to face Sebastian Sylvester for the IBF middleweight title after the Spaniard failed a dope test during training.
"No insurance covers that and it's a big problem," said Meyer. "But we are prepared to take this risk."
Meyer added: "If you are an amateur athlete there is no discussion about this."
"We have to demonstrate to the public that we do not cheat - we play with open cards. It's important for the survival of the sport.
"Perhaps in the long run the Mayweather-Pacquiao situation will be good for boxing."
Interviews by BBC Radio 5 Live boxing correspondent Mike Costello. Writing by broadcast journalist Nabil Hassan
Source: news.bbc.co.uk
Pacquiao tops list: Five guys Joshua Clottey can, cannot beat -- Examiner
By Michael Marley, Examiner.com
Obviously, Joshua Clottey is a marketable commodity. But his pre Manny Pacquiao fight remarks must be taken with grains of salt, maybe 12 million grains of salt.
Like President Bam Bam in his feisty State of the Union speech Wednesday night, Clottey is hitting all the right notes.
The Ghanaian is saying that Megamanny is not superman. He says he knows how to handle southpaws. He says he won’t be in the Cowboys Stadium on march 13 merely to collect the biggest purse of his distinguished if hardly remarkable career.
Speculative promises are one thing and hot air is another. Surely, Clottey is entitled to the preflight palaver but, when he says his prayers and tucks himself into bed at night, does he believe what he says?
I don’t think so because he is not The Man who will stop The Manny.
Which brings me to a little list of fighters Clottey won’t beat and fighters he can beat:
JOSHUA CLOTTEY CANNOT BEAT:
1. MANNY PACQUIAO: The Pacman is still climbing up the ladder, a frightening thought for any foe. Is you ready for this, Mr. Mayweather? Give Sugar Shane Mosley a slim chance to derail the Pacman Express and give Mayweather the greater possibility of doing so with his slap and run style. Clottey runs second to Manny every time. Great writer J.D. Salinger just died at 91 which reminds me that, come March 13, the "Catcher in the Rye" will be Clottey, catching nearly all of Pacquiao's punches.
2. FLOYD MAYWEATHER: Obama’s new chant is jobs, jobs, jobs, only one letter different than Money May’s old chant of jabs, jabs, jabs. I doubt Clottey wins a single round with Mayweather rolling those shoulders, dipping those hips and ramming that jab in his kisser.
3. SUGAR SHANE MOSLEY: Nearing 40 but he’d be 40 and fabulous against Clottey. Mosley’s work rate and stretch run would give him a clear cut victory on points.
4. LUIS COLLAZO: Does Lefty Louie from Coney Island carry the swine flu? I wonder the way he gets avoided. He and Clottey will never fight, being in different promotional camps but Collazo is another portsider who Josh would only be joshing with.
5. YURI I’M NO BORE, MAN, FOREMAN: Rabbi to be would take Clottey to shul, er I mean school over 12 rounds and take comfotrtable decision. Only 27, Foreman’s confidence got huge boost with title victory over proven banger Daniel Santos. This could happen as both are Top Rank cattle, er I mean chattel.
JOSHUA CLOTTEY CAN BEAT:
1. RICKY HATTON: This fight carried on Comedy Central, ho, ho and few more hos.
2. ANDRE BERTO: Never happens as Uncle Bob and Uncle Al (Haymon) fighers rarely mix it up. Berto probably nips Clottey but, properly inspired and with a trainer who pushes him from rounds eight through 12, Josh could possible defeat Berto.
3. ANTONIO MARGARITO: Revenge bout for Clottey but unlikely to happen. Who knows what Bandito Margocheato has left after suspension year on shelf? Arum might make this bout after both get beaten by his Megacash Cow from Gen San.
4. YO PAULIE MALIGNAGGI: Think Clottey would prove too physically strong for sorehanded Brookllynite. Unlikely to ever happen but it would be interesting but short of compelling.
5. CORY SPINKS: Joshua could beat Cory but they will never fight and Cory would put on a boxing clinic to nab a points verdict. It would take extra effort for Clottey to defeat the jabbing master out of ‘The Lou.
(mlcmarley@aol.com)
Source: examiner.com
***
Obviously, Joshua Clottey is a marketable commodity. But his pre Manny Pacquiao fight remarks must be taken with grains of salt, maybe 12 million grains of salt.
Like President Bam Bam in his feisty State of the Union speech Wednesday night, Clottey is hitting all the right notes.
The Ghanaian is saying that Megamanny is not superman. He says he knows how to handle southpaws. He says he won’t be in the Cowboys Stadium on march 13 merely to collect the biggest purse of his distinguished if hardly remarkable career.
Speculative promises are one thing and hot air is another. Surely, Clottey is entitled to the preflight palaver but, when he says his prayers and tucks himself into bed at night, does he believe what he says?
I don’t think so because he is not The Man who will stop The Manny.
Which brings me to a little list of fighters Clottey won’t beat and fighters he can beat:
JOSHUA CLOTTEY CANNOT BEAT:
1. MANNY PACQUIAO: The Pacman is still climbing up the ladder, a frightening thought for any foe. Is you ready for this, Mr. Mayweather? Give Sugar Shane Mosley a slim chance to derail the Pacman Express and give Mayweather the greater possibility of doing so with his slap and run style. Clottey runs second to Manny every time. Great writer J.D. Salinger just died at 91 which reminds me that, come March 13, the "Catcher in the Rye" will be Clottey, catching nearly all of Pacquiao's punches.
2. FLOYD MAYWEATHER: Obama’s new chant is jobs, jobs, jobs, only one letter different than Money May’s old chant of jabs, jabs, jabs. I doubt Clottey wins a single round with Mayweather rolling those shoulders, dipping those hips and ramming that jab in his kisser.
3. SUGAR SHANE MOSLEY: Nearing 40 but he’d be 40 and fabulous against Clottey. Mosley’s work rate and stretch run would give him a clear cut victory on points.
4. LUIS COLLAZO: Does Lefty Louie from Coney Island carry the swine flu? I wonder the way he gets avoided. He and Clottey will never fight, being in different promotional camps but Collazo is another portsider who Josh would only be joshing with.
5. YURI I’M NO BORE, MAN, FOREMAN: Rabbi to be would take Clottey to shul, er I mean school over 12 rounds and take comfotrtable decision. Only 27, Foreman’s confidence got huge boost with title victory over proven banger Daniel Santos. This could happen as both are Top Rank cattle, er I mean chattel.
JOSHUA CLOTTEY CAN BEAT:
1. RICKY HATTON: This fight carried on Comedy Central, ho, ho and few more hos.
2. ANDRE BERTO: Never happens as Uncle Bob and Uncle Al (Haymon) fighers rarely mix it up. Berto probably nips Clottey but, properly inspired and with a trainer who pushes him from rounds eight through 12, Josh could possible defeat Berto.
3. ANTONIO MARGARITO: Revenge bout for Clottey but unlikely to happen. Who knows what Bandito Margocheato has left after suspension year on shelf? Arum might make this bout after both get beaten by his Megacash Cow from Gen San.
4. YO PAULIE MALIGNAGGI: Think Clottey would prove too physically strong for sorehanded Brookllynite. Unlikely to ever happen but it would be interesting but short of compelling.
5. CORY SPINKS: Joshua could beat Cory but they will never fight and Cory would put on a boxing clinic to nab a points verdict. It would take extra effort for Clottey to defeat the jabbing master out of ‘The Lou.
(mlcmarley@aol.com)
Source: examiner.com
***
De La Hoya : Pacquiao versus Mayweather a lot sooner than people think -- Richmark Sentinel
The Richmark Sentinel
While Filipino Manny Pacquiao is preparing for his bout against Joshua Clottey at Cowboys Stadium in Texas on March 13, Oscar De La Hoya, head of Golden Boy Promotions, is busy lining up a fight between Floyd Mayweather Jr. and. Sugar Shane Mosley for sometime in May.
That said, as far as De La Hoya is concerned, those are simply the fights before the real fight that fans have been waiting for.
Manny Pacquiao versus Floyd Mayweather Jr.
"That fight has to happen," De La Hoya said Tuesday of the proposed bout which fell apart earlier this month in a drug-testing dispute. "It's too big not to happen. We just have to cross one hurdle."
De La Hoya is adamant that it will be taking place “and a lot sooner than people think”.
Attention now however has to turn to Pacquiao against Cottey.
His former trainer Rick Stehely doesn’t believe that Pacquiao can lose but most punters think it will be a lot closer than that. Clottey is a former world champion and should he somehow manage to pull off a remarkable victory his value would go through the roof.
Accordingly he won’t be there to make up the numbers.
This is Pacquiao’s first defense of his WBO welterweight title and even Stehely believes that Clottey could go all twelve rounds with his former boxer. But if that is the case he is predicting a big points win for the champion.
Australian promoter Peter Maniatis pointed out that this will be the first time that Pacquiao will fight at 147 pounds since he faced Oscar De La Hoya. He believes that while Clottey “is a tough fighter", Pacquiao is a superstar the likes of which he has never seen before.
When all is done and dusted all that fight fans will want to know is when is the Manny Pacquiao versus Floyd Mayweather Jr. super-fight taking place.
If anyone mentions drug testing they'll probably land up bound and gagged and be used as a practice dummy for clinical drug testing trials.
Bring on the big one!
Source: therichmarksentinel.com
***
While Filipino Manny Pacquiao is preparing for his bout against Joshua Clottey at Cowboys Stadium in Texas on March 13, Oscar De La Hoya, head of Golden Boy Promotions, is busy lining up a fight between Floyd Mayweather Jr. and. Sugar Shane Mosley for sometime in May.
That said, as far as De La Hoya is concerned, those are simply the fights before the real fight that fans have been waiting for.
Manny Pacquiao versus Floyd Mayweather Jr.
"That fight has to happen," De La Hoya said Tuesday of the proposed bout which fell apart earlier this month in a drug-testing dispute. "It's too big not to happen. We just have to cross one hurdle."
De La Hoya is adamant that it will be taking place “and a lot sooner than people think”.
Attention now however has to turn to Pacquiao against Cottey.
His former trainer Rick Stehely doesn’t believe that Pacquiao can lose but most punters think it will be a lot closer than that. Clottey is a former world champion and should he somehow manage to pull off a remarkable victory his value would go through the roof.
Accordingly he won’t be there to make up the numbers.
This is Pacquiao’s first defense of his WBO welterweight title and even Stehely believes that Clottey could go all twelve rounds with his former boxer. But if that is the case he is predicting a big points win for the champion.
Australian promoter Peter Maniatis pointed out that this will be the first time that Pacquiao will fight at 147 pounds since he faced Oscar De La Hoya. He believes that while Clottey “is a tough fighter", Pacquiao is a superstar the likes of which he has never seen before.
When all is done and dusted all that fight fans will want to know is when is the Manny Pacquiao versus Floyd Mayweather Jr. super-fight taking place.
If anyone mentions drug testing they'll probably land up bound and gagged and be used as a practice dummy for clinical drug testing trials.
Bring on the big one!
Source: therichmarksentinel.com
***
Pop The Bubbly! Boxing Did The Right Thing -- The Sweet Science
By Ron Borges, The Sweet Science
Ken Hershman and SHOWTIME have managed to do the most unusual thing in boxing. They’ve done the right thing.
The right thing happens in boxing outside the ring about as often as Haley’s Comet passes by your window. These guys do the right thing about as regularly as Bernie Madoff invested his client’s money.
So when it was announced this week that Allan Green had been chosen to replace Jermain Taylor in SHOWTIME’s brilliant Super 6 Super Middleweight tournament the news was welcomed by any true fan of the sport not because Green was the only possible choice but because the plan all along had been for Green to serve as first alternate and the folks running the show actually did what they said they’d do.
After Taylor was knocked cold by Arthur Abraham, his fourth defeat in his last five fights and the third by knockout, speculation was that Taylor would remove himself from further participation. Although he seemed to balk at that initially, ultimately Taylor listened to his family and advisors and pulled out of the tournament. That’s when things began to go awry as they often do in this sport.
By the time Taylor pulled out, Green (29-1, 20 KO) was set to fight Sakio Bika, the former Contender participant, and there had already been calls from promoter Dan Goossen that Green should have to fight Edison Miranda in a box-off. At that rate, Green would have had to win a tournament to get into a tournament.
But the Bika fight went away as it should have (probably in exchange for a paycheck) and Green was added to the mix without having to even nod in Miranda’s direction and rightfully so, taking over Taylor’s scheduled April 17 fight against Andre Ward. Although one could make a strong case for the inclusion of the one major super middleweight champion not in the tournament, Lucien Bute, the fact of the matter is there have been three European fighters and three Americans involved from the start. When Taylor pulled out it opened an American slot and the guy who had been unofficially promised it actually got it.
More importantly, he should be in it. Green is a fearsome power puncher who will be competitive against Ward and any of the other combatants. He didn’t deserve to be made the victim of the usual boxing poli-tricks, as Lennox Lewis used to put it, of being forced to fight in some sort of half-assed boxoff that would have only served to muddy the waters.
Instead, for once, common sense prevailed. One American fighter was out. He was replaced by a guy who clearly is the next best American super middleweight fighting today. Bravo!
This made so much sense it’s shocking that boxing actually embraced it but it did and give Hershman the credit because, in the end, it’s SHOWTIME’s show and they can do what they will or may with it. What they did, one way or another, was replace a guy who probably never should have been in the tournament in the first place except for his name value with a guy who could very easily knock out Ward or any of the four other competitors, a fact that adds some spice to the entire affair.
Because of the fact Green will inherit Taylor’s empty scorecard he is at an obvious disadvantage but a knockout win, which is his specialty, immediately nets him three points. Do that twice and he’s as likely to reach the semi-finals as anyone.
More importantly, if Green wants to move on to the Final Four fights he will be forced to go for the knockout against Ward in his first fight and against Mikkel Kessler in his second. If nothing else the pointless position he inherits from Taylor should add some fire to a guy who normally comes to the arena with the intention of leaving someone unconscious anyway.
So, in the end, boxing got it right this time and deserves credit for it. It is a small step back from the abyss after the debacle of the failed Floyd Mayweather-Manny Pacquiao negotiations but we’ll take it in the hope Ken Hershman’s decision will open up a few more eyes to the way boxing should be run.
Source: thesweetscience.com
Ken Hershman and SHOWTIME have managed to do the most unusual thing in boxing. They’ve done the right thing.
The right thing happens in boxing outside the ring about as often as Haley’s Comet passes by your window. These guys do the right thing about as regularly as Bernie Madoff invested his client’s money.
So when it was announced this week that Allan Green had been chosen to replace Jermain Taylor in SHOWTIME’s brilliant Super 6 Super Middleweight tournament the news was welcomed by any true fan of the sport not because Green was the only possible choice but because the plan all along had been for Green to serve as first alternate and the folks running the show actually did what they said they’d do.
After Taylor was knocked cold by Arthur Abraham, his fourth defeat in his last five fights and the third by knockout, speculation was that Taylor would remove himself from further participation. Although he seemed to balk at that initially, ultimately Taylor listened to his family and advisors and pulled out of the tournament. That’s when things began to go awry as they often do in this sport.
By the time Taylor pulled out, Green (29-1, 20 KO) was set to fight Sakio Bika, the former Contender participant, and there had already been calls from promoter Dan Goossen that Green should have to fight Edison Miranda in a box-off. At that rate, Green would have had to win a tournament to get into a tournament.
But the Bika fight went away as it should have (probably in exchange for a paycheck) and Green was added to the mix without having to even nod in Miranda’s direction and rightfully so, taking over Taylor’s scheduled April 17 fight against Andre Ward. Although one could make a strong case for the inclusion of the one major super middleweight champion not in the tournament, Lucien Bute, the fact of the matter is there have been three European fighters and three Americans involved from the start. When Taylor pulled out it opened an American slot and the guy who had been unofficially promised it actually got it.
More importantly, he should be in it. Green is a fearsome power puncher who will be competitive against Ward and any of the other combatants. He didn’t deserve to be made the victim of the usual boxing poli-tricks, as Lennox Lewis used to put it, of being forced to fight in some sort of half-assed boxoff that would have only served to muddy the waters.
Instead, for once, common sense prevailed. One American fighter was out. He was replaced by a guy who clearly is the next best American super middleweight fighting today. Bravo!
This made so much sense it’s shocking that boxing actually embraced it but it did and give Hershman the credit because, in the end, it’s SHOWTIME’s show and they can do what they will or may with it. What they did, one way or another, was replace a guy who probably never should have been in the tournament in the first place except for his name value with a guy who could very easily knock out Ward or any of the four other competitors, a fact that adds some spice to the entire affair.
Because of the fact Green will inherit Taylor’s empty scorecard he is at an obvious disadvantage but a knockout win, which is his specialty, immediately nets him three points. Do that twice and he’s as likely to reach the semi-finals as anyone.
More importantly, if Green wants to move on to the Final Four fights he will be forced to go for the knockout against Ward in his first fight and against Mikkel Kessler in his second. If nothing else the pointless position he inherits from Taylor should add some fire to a guy who normally comes to the arena with the intention of leaving someone unconscious anyway.
So, in the end, boxing got it right this time and deserves credit for it. It is a small step back from the abyss after the debacle of the failed Floyd Mayweather-Manny Pacquiao negotiations but we’ll take it in the hope Ken Hershman’s decision will open up a few more eyes to the way boxing should be run.
Source: thesweetscience.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)