Tuesday 8 June 2010

Ricky Hatton needs a fight to overcome his demons, says CEO of Hatton Promotions -- Telegraph

By Gareth A Davies, Telegraph.co.uk

Williams also claimed that if Hatton decides to make a comeback, he is still the biggest box office draw in the country, outside of a heavyweight unification contest between David Haye and one of the Klitschko brothers.

“The more time I spend with Ricky, the more I think he will fight again. I never thought I’d say this but I think it is safer for him to fight because he needs the discipline. He’s an ‘all or nothing’ guy,” said Williams.

Pacquiao vs Hatton DVDWilliams also disclosed that Hatton has been back in training in the gym, and took part in a charity football match last weekend between a celebrity England team and a Rest Of The World XI. “He was training last week as if he was in the first week of training with a fight coming up in three months’ time,” he said.

Hatton has not fought since he was knocked out in two rounds by Manny Pacquiao in a Las Vegas ring 13 months ago.

“If he had a fight in four months’ time, he’d have five per cent body fat and would be in phenomenal shape. He needs a target, he needs focus," Williams said.

“I would never push Ricky to fight, it makes no difference to me personally - I just get on with promoting his company. Boxing is an all or nothing sport, you do not have the benefit of being substituted or bowling slower, as with football or cricket, you cannot even play at a lower level.

"If you are not 100 per cent fit, the consequences can be devastating. Ricky has always said that only he will know if and when he will fight again. I will support whatever decision he makes.

"There are plenty of demons left there after the Manny Pacquiao fight, and in Ricky’s mind, there is unfinished business. He was definitely not prepared correctly for the Pacquiao fight.

“Michael Katsidis would be a perfect fight for him. He’s a big name and it would be a good fight for Ricky, and it would be a good fight in England that would work on Sky Box Office.”

Williams insisted Hatton is still the biggest box office fighter in England.

"I obviously spend a lot of time with him and this last 12 months we have visited America, South Africa, China and Australia. The amount of recognition and attention he gets is phenomenal," he said.

“Whatever happens he has achieved so much. If he never fights again, he will go down as one of the great British fighters, and the good thing is that he does not have to fight again for financial reasons, and not many boxers can say that.”

Source: telegraph.co.uk

USADA's Travis Tygart: 'Do the Right Thing for Clean Athletes' -- FanHouse

By Lem Satterfield, FanHouse

As the chief executive director of the United States Anti-Doping Agency, Travis Tygart will be involved in Wednesday's hearing with the Nevada State Athletic Commission which will address its protocol for drug testing in general, and for steroids and illegal drugs in particular.

Various officials already have spoken to the NSAC during a meeting on Sept. 20, 2008, according to commission director, Keith Kizer, but this is Tygart's first go-round after having achieved a boxing first by implementing and overseeing the random testing of blood and urine on both Floyd Mayweather and Shane Mosley during the lead up to their May 1 clash won by Mayweather.

In this Q&A, Tygart speaks about a number of issues, including the testing schedule released for Mayweather and Mosley.

Mayweather had both blood and urine taken on March 22, April 1, April 13 and then on the night directly after the fight. Mayweather provided urine only on April 3, April 6, April 21 and April 24. Mosley provided both blood and urine on March 23, March 31, April 12 and directly after the bout on fight night. Mosley provided urine on April 3, April 6, April 21 and April 24.

FanHouse: Travis, what impact do you believe that the random drug testing of Floyd Mayweather and Shane Mosley has had on boxing?

Travis Tygart: You know, I think that it's caused a healthy discussion. Certainly, from our perspective, it was a sport that knew very little about the importance of having strong, anti-doping provisions in place. That has created an awful lot of discussion. You know, you had a successful program that was run for one of the biggest fights in history.

The Floyd Mayweather-Shane Mosley fight for random testing, that was unprecedented in that it was two professional boxers for the first time who voluntarily submitted to the World Anti-Doping Agency Code testing program, and I think that that speaks volumes about the importance of this issue.

And, you know, there is a hearing set for Wednesday with the Nevada State Athletic Commission, that I will actually be testifying at that hearing on Wednesday. I think that the fact that we've been contacted by a number of other state athletic commissions in boxing to have a discussion is a good thing. I don't want to name the different commissions, but we've got meetings set up with some, and have had contact with several others.

So I think it's certainly becoming an educational process you know? Ultimately, people can decide whether they want to do everything possible to protect the integrity of the sport for clean athletes or not. At least they'll have the information available to make that decision.

FH: I understand that Andre Ward and Allan Green have requested Olympic style random drug testing for their June 19, WBA championship bout that will be in Oakland Calif., so have you been in contact with those fighters or that commission?

Tygart: You know, I know that you're doing your job asking that question, but just, at this point, out of respect for those that have contacted us and have preferred that we not have this out in the media right now, I don't want to say. I think that the point that is important is that the discussions have started.

It's important that the first call that we got was a call to us, and not something that we made, and that it was back in December, and that a lot has transpired in a very short amount of time. This has created a good, ground swell. Ultimately will that end up with WADA Code programs being implemented in the 50 states?

I can't say that for sure. That would obviously be the best thing for clean athletes and a clean sport. But it took four years for that to happen within the Olympic movement -- from late 1999 until 2004. So, we appreciate that there are a lot of complex issues, and they deal with science, and they deal with law, and they deal with sport.

That's going to take a lot, particularly on state athletic commissions that have turnover and that are politically driven, meaning that they are typically appointed by the governor who changes from time-to-time in various states. So, hopefully, we're at a point where we can have a good, consistent dialogue with the states.

Hopefully, those that are in power can make the right decisions. It's the same easy decisions that hundreds of sport entities and national Olympic committees and governments around the world have made to implement the WADA code in their territories.

FH: What complicates it to the point where there is a debate as to whether or not this is needed?

Tygart: I think that there shouldn't be. When people understand, there shouldn't be a debate. But it's all based on the level of understanding of the issues. I mean, it's easy to say that you need to do blood testing, and for someone in my seat, it's a no-brainer.

It's simple: If you don't have it, you're not protecting clean athletes and the integrity of your sport. But others out there want to say that you can have a fine program without blood testing. And I think I heard early on, by someone who suggested back in early December around the Floyd Mayweather- Manny Pacquiao negotiations, that blood testing is antiquated.

Well, if that's someone's belief then they're just wrong. And it might take some time for us or anyone else why there is a need for blood testing, and then, to explain the procedures. And to explain that it's not a large amount of blood, but a very small amount of blood.

And that here sort of why you can't have a black out period or a 24-day or a 14-day period where you're not going to take blood or not test. That doesn't mean that you're going to test every minute of every day up to a competition in order to be effective. In fact, you can have an 18-day window [where no blood was taken from either fighter] like we did with the Mayweather-Mosley fight.

That was acceptable and it is an acceptable program when it is coupled with saving samples for later re-testing. A lot of people go into that specific situation. I heard that there was some complaint or criticism of that.

FH: How do you mean?

Tygart: The term random is misused sometimes. It was, from the two athletes' point of view -- Mayweather and Mosley -- completely random. They have no idea when they when they're going to be tested. We really call that 'No advanced notice.' So they don't know when we're going to show up.

But from our perspective, it's not random at all, but highly intelligent. So we map out exactly when we're going to test, and when we're not going to test. We do that to be the most effective. In this situation, with Mayweather and Mosley, we were basing it on a number of tests and the test results that we received.

Based on the fact that we were saving samples for later retesting, we were perfectly comfortable that we were running an effective program and not blood testing them within 18 days of the fight. That was absolutely by choice and by design. If there is criticism of that, then it's not well-based.

Why it's perfectly acceptable is that the athletes, No. 1, didn't know. So that the deterrent effect was still there. No. 2, we look at the total number of tests that we did as well as the fact that we're saving their samples. And they did a urine and a blood test after the fight.

So we're saving those samples for later re-testing. And it's no secret for those that know that there is a new, human growth hormone test on the near horizon that has a much longer window of detection.

So, having that post-fight with the ability to re-test it with that new test made us totally comfortable only having that blood test 18 days before the fight and not needing one more testing day in between.

And importantly, the reality is, the people who want to criticize, they were hoping that we were going to blood test the day of the fight or the day before the fight, or two days or four days before the fight.

And then, they were going to hope and pray that whatever fighter lost, that fighter was going to blame the blood test. So since that didn't happen -- and that testing didn't need to happen to have an effective program -- they now have to try to complain that the window was too big.

But they have no other argument. So, from our perspective, what we decided -- and this is doctors, scientists and people who do this day in and day out -- that we would do the right thing for clean athletes.

Given the re-testing, the new tests for HGH becoming available, and given a number of tests for both blood and urine, and given the no-advance notice, and the no blackout window for testing, we were totally comfortable that this was an intelligently designed program.

Source: boxing.fanhouse.com

Nevada Commission's Keith Kizer on USADA Random Drug Testing -- FanHouse

By Lem Satterfield, FanHouse

On Wednesday, the Nevada State Athletic Commission will hold a hearing addressing its protocol for drug testing in general, and for steroids and illegal drugs in particular, "as a follow-up from the commission's examination" of the issues during its September 30, 2008, meeting, said director Keith Kizer.

The hearing is to involve input from various officials, including Travis Tygart, chief executive director of the United States Anti-Doping Agency, which implemented random testing of blood and urine on both Floyd Mayweather and Shane Mosley during the lead up to their May 1 clash won by Mayweather.

Mayweather had both blood and urine taken on March 22, April 1, April 13 and then on the night directly after the fight. Mayweather provided urine only on April 3, April 6, April 21 and April 24. Mosley provided both blood and urine on March 23, March 31, April 12 and directly after the bout on fight night. Mosley provided urine on April 3, April 6, April 21 and April 24.

Kizer spoke to FanHouse in this Q&A

FanHouse: What are the chances of random blood testing for steroids becoming a regular part of the protocol for the Nevada State Athletic Commission?

Keith Kizer: Right now, we don't do that. Whether or not that would change, somebody would have to make a damn good case for that to happen. But that's one of the reasons that we have this meeting on Wednesday.

FH: How often do you have these hearings or meetings involving steroids testing protocol?

Kizer: Well I had mentioned to you earlier that we had had one probably 18 months ago, in September of 2008, and that's something that we wanted to take a look at.

We had a lot of information from our last meeting from several doctors, for example, with Dr. Robert Voy, who used to be in charge of the United States Olympic Committee's drug testing policy.

And Dr. Voy had actually left there because he thought it was a little bit weak. So he resigned and he's one of the world's most knowledgeable experts. Dr. Raymond Kelly is out of Buffalo, New York, and he works for the state university out of Buffalo.

And Dr. Kelly is also a leading expert and he was brought in by Dr. Voy the last time. Dr. Louis Jambor came from Quest Diagnostics. Dr. Barry Sample is the main doctor at Quest. But Dr. Sample had gotten Dr. Jambor to call in on our last meeting, so the three of them -- Dr. Voy, Dr. Kelly and Dr. Jambor testified.

Lou Jambor is the director of toxicology testing on the West Coast for Quest Dianostics. Bill Bock was also able to send in some information. Bill Bock is the USADA's lawyer.

FH: What sort of information was helpful?

Kizer: They have a really good wallet card that they give the athletes, where one side shows you what's allowed, and the other, what's prohibited. So this last meeting, and the feedback that we received from it, we figured that it was definitely something where we wanted to take a look at it again.

It's been about 18 months, or a little bit past 18 months, so we figured that now would be a pretty good time again. What comes out of that meeting, I don't know. I'm just as interested as anyone else to hear from the experts.

FH: What was on the wallet cards?

Kizer: Well, for example, you see that steroids are always prohibited. Alcohol is only prohibited during competition. So it's a very good card. In fact, we were sent a bunch of copies of that to link it to our website.

FH: Can you give the website address where the general public can retreive information on what is and is not legal?

Kizer: If you go to our website, you will see there is a thing that says FAQ, which means, Frequently Asked Questions. And you'll see midway through the FAQ, drug testing, and there's direct links to our information and to the World Anti-Doping Association lists and the wallet card that we were talking about. The website is http://boxing.nv.gov/New_FAQ.htm

FH: Were you given any explanation as to why Floyd Mayweather and Shane Mosley were not blood-tested closer than within 18 days of their fight?

Kizer: We were never given any explanation about that. You would have to ask Travis Tygart that or Richard Schaefer or Leonard Ellerbe or someone else that question. I don't know why they did that after making such a big deal about it.

You'd have to ask them. I've not talk to anyone at Golden Boy or someone from Mayweather's camp. Travis Tygart has told me that they could have done a blood test at any time and at any day or every day of training camp. But they only did four.

And this is Travis talking, 'It just so happened that the last one for each guy was more than two weeks out.' But they could have done it 10 days out, they could have done it five days out, they could have done it two days out.

That's what he's telling me. I have no evidence one way or the other on that.

FH: What is your feeling about what turns out to look like a window where there was no blood testing?

Kizer: I really have no feeling about it. The good thing, I guess, is that if you do it closer, you do run the risk of nicking a vein or infecting the arm, or something along those lines. Bruising the arm is something that might have caused the fight to be called off.

Whether or not that was the reason they didn't do it closer, I don't know. You'd have to ask them. It may be, it may not be. That's completely up to them to decide when and when not to do their blood test. That was a private contract that we didn't get involved with.

But that went on, and everybody tested negative, and that was the good news. I also understand that everyone passed their USADA tests, so that was great. So congratulations to all of the athletes. It was great that the fight was able to happen.

FH: Did anything more conclusive for you come out of USADA's involvement in the blood testing for Floyd Mayweather-Shane Mosley?

Kizer: The good news is that we had a meeting with USADA at the end of March. Pat Lundvall, the chairman of the Nevada Commission, and I had a meeting with their chief medical officer, Dr. Larry Bowers, and, Travis Tygart. They came to Pat Lundvall's office and we met with them for a few hours.

We gave them some thoughts on how we thought USADA could do a better job, and they gave us some thoughts on how they thought that the athletic commission could do a better job. It was a very fruitful meeting.

Unfortunately, Travis told us that 'Our hands our kind of tied by WADA. We have to follow what WADA says or we'd lose their acreditation.' With the Nevada Commission, we don't have to worry about that.

If we think that there's a better way to do it, we're not hamstrung by WADA. However, I think that there is a lot that we can learn from WADA and USADA. We have a more limited situation because of our budget.

But they have been very helpful, and that's what this meeting is for, to examine ways that we can perhaps improve our drug testing protocol. At the end of the day, no one knows everything. So we want to hear some of the things from the experts.

It's interesting to hear some of the different tricks people play, be it from blood doping to EPO or other things as well. It's good to hear sort of the war stories from the guys in the field.

FH: Was the random testing for Floyd Mayweather-Shane Mosley a step in the right direction?

Kizer: I don't know if it's either. That was a private deal they had with USADA and it didn't have anything to do with us. As long as it didn't interfere with our drug testing, and it didn't. There's no pro or con on that. The important thing was to make sure that it didn't interfere with our drug testing, and it didn't.

Both guys passed our drug testing requirements. Fighters have their right to do more testing, and as long as it doesn't interfere with the commissions, more power to them. Whether or not other fighters want to do it or should do it or don't want to do it, it up to the fighters.

Source: boxing.fanhouse.com

Former champion Foreman to have surgery on knee -- USA Today

By Dave Skretta, AP Sports Writer

NEW YORK — Former junior middleweight champion Yuri Foreman will need surgery on his right knee after tearing his meniscus and stretching ligaments Saturday night at Yankee Stadium.

The MeniscusForeman was hurt in the seventh round of his fight against Miguel Cotto, which he eventually lost when referee Arthur Mercante Jr. waved it off early in the ninth round.

Foreman visited Dr. Gerard Varlotta, a joint specialist at The Rusk Institute in New York, and was told Monday he would need surgery on the knee. Foreman wasn't sure when it will be scheduled or how long he might be out of the ring.

"I will need surgery and I don't know yet how big it is," Foreman told The Associated Press. "I'm going to find out soon, probably in the next day or two."

Foreman said Varlotta was ringside for the fight and saw the injury happen.

The aspiring rabbi hurt himself when he slipped to the canvas in the seventh round on a steamy night in the Bronx. Foreman elected to continue fighting, even though he could barely move around, and survived to the end of the round.

Early in the eighth, Foreman was trading blows with Cotto when his corner threw a white towel into the ring to stop the fight. Mercante angrily tossed the towel out, even though dozens of people were already flooding through the ropes, and asked Foreman whether he wanted to keep fighting. Foreman said yes, the ring was cleared and the bout resumed.

Foreman's biggest weapon is his speed and defense, and his movement was compromised by the balky right knee. Cotto was able to stand in front of Foreman and finally landed a crushing body shot early in the ninth round that ended the fight.

Foreman said that besides the knee injury, he came out of the first main event at Yankee Stadium in more than three decades in good shape a few bumps and bruises and some swelling from the barrage of blows landed by Cotto, now a three-division world champion.

"Yeah," Foreman said, "I feel OK."

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source: usatoday.com

Bottom Line, Arthur Mercante Jr. Adhered To The Rulebook -- The Sweet Science

By Michael Woods, The Sweet Science

The fight itself was no classic, as Yuri Foreman found out right quick that we'd pulled a Mark Twain deal on him and you, that the press had decided prematurely that 29-year-old Miguel Cotto was stick-a-fork-in-him done.

Not so, it looked like in minute one, as Cotto's hand speed was there, and his legs were sturdy underneath him. And if his power didn't exactly overwhelm at 154, and he looked a bit more like his brother Jose than the Miguel who'd won three titles, it was still enough to get the better of Foreman.

Yuri, as we'd posited on ESPNNewYork.com (here's the link, check the seventh-to-last paragraph...sports.espn.go.com/new-york/news/story), was perhaps the beneficiary of an avalanche of pre-fight hype. We focused excessively on his superlative backstory, the rabbi-to-be angle, and neglected to examine the resume, and compare it to Cotto's, as much as was warranted. And guess what? I more than played a part in that.

LOL.

Cotto sized up Foreman's lack of pop immediately and as Frank Lotierzo will point out in a column that goes up tonight, that lack of firepower made Cotto infinitely bolder. It's much easier to stick to your agenda when you know the other guy has to catch you totally unawares with a perfectly placed shot to hurt you.

So the scorecards, two of which gave Yuri just one round, another gave him two, hinted at the lack of drama in the bout. But no one on the New York fight scene will soon forget this main event, because of what went down in the eighth round. Foreman trainer Joe Grier didn't like the way his fighter was looking, as he'd slipped twice and was favoring his right knee, which he'd hurt as a teen in Israel. So, responding to his own eyes, and the lobbying of Foreman's wife Leyla, a few rows away from the corner, he lobbed a towel into the ring. This, in his mind, signaled a surrender. In the mind of referee Arthur Mercante, that towel did no such thing.

From my seat in press row, I howled in protest as Mercante blew off the towel, refused to accept the flag of surrender. After a delay in which Mercante, Grier, Foreman and the New York State Athletic Commission conferred, the action re-commenced. We heard a message of supposed clarification from a well meaning Michael Buffer, who said that Mercante had refused to acknowledge the towel because he didn't know its origin, and said it came from an "outside source." On fight night, I heard that, and howled louder. Because I was pretty damned sure I'd seen Grier lob the towel. It didn't come from some hot dog vendor, or whatever.

So my Irish was up. I was heated.

Then the eighth round ended. Foreman went to his corner. He was looked at by Grier, and by a ring doc. He said he wanted to continue. His knee was hurting him, but he wanted to go on. He wanted to be the brave warrior, represent himself, and his nation of origin, with valor. We always ask the combatants we most revere to do just that, right?

Cotto knew he had a wounded animal in front of him to start the ninth, and he bore in for the kill. This was no Andrey Tsurkan, or James Moore and David Santos coming in to finish the deal. This was Miguel Cotto, a veteran of the very highest levels battles. Was this 'A' grade Cotto, classic Cotto? No, but it was still 'B+" grade, better than anything Foreman has ever had to contend with. I'd been muttering to myself, and Tweeting, that Cotto should go to the body, take something from Yuri's legs. He did, with a Micky Ward special.

Foreman went down, in agony, and now Mercante pulled the plug. He gave the kid every chance to pull the miracle upset, but Cotto, and his limitations as a boxer, were too much for him. It was over, less than a minute into the ninth round.

But the controversy lingered. TowelGate, I referred to the incident in my ESPNNewYork column that went up that night. At the Stadium we debated the issue. We wondered why Mercante hadn't accepted the towel. We saw a hurt warrior, on a gimpy leg, we didn't want him to take unnecessary punishment. We heard Mercante's explanation after the bout, heard him say, “The towel came in, in the heat of battle. There was a good exchange going at that moment. And the towel came in and I felt it wasn’t necessary… and I didn’t know where it came from. About ten seconds prior to that, someone from the corner stepped up and said, “Stop the fight, stop the fight.” I looked and there was no one in the corner. There was no need to stop the fight. They were just in the middle of a good fight, a great fight. That’s what the fans came to see. It was a shame…”

That last part stood out for me, at the time. Why, I wondered, is that even part of the equation to Mercante? You all know I lobby all the time for fighters to see themselves as entertainer-athletes, if they wish to maximize their earnings, and lean towards being offensive minded pugilists if they want to be seen as fan-friendly boxers. But a ref can't let that factor into his decision-making, in my mind.

So I wasn't all pro Mercante on Saturday night, for sure. But I must make this admission--that is because I wasn't in possession of all the fact. Fact is, NY rules say that he did the right thing.
Here's Rule 210.17 from their rulebook. It's been in there since the 1930s, I believe.

"No one shall throw any towel into the ring as a signal of defeat or for any other reason."

There you go. Only the ref or the doctor can stop a fight, according to commission rules. Though a cornerman can stop the bout by walking up onto the apron, and getting his fighter disqualified.

Mercante knew that on that night. In the stands, I didn't. In press row, we weren't sure if the refusal to honor the cornerman's signal of submission was part of the unified rules, or a NY-centric rule. The fans, most of them, didn't know the rule. Buffer tried to do the right thing by offering clarity, but his effort fell short, as the towel didn't get thrown from any grassy knoll.

NYSAC chief Melvina Lathan talked to TSS on Monday. "I do think Arthur did what he was supposed to do. I always tell the referees, 'Be aware of the fighter, and if you feel he is not defending himself properly, and you feel the need to stop it, I'll back you one hundred percent. I much prefer that the fight be stopped sooner rather than later."

NYSAC director of boxing Ralph Petrillo told TSS that Mercante did the right thing in the eighth as well. "There was no way for him to ascertain where the towel came from. He did the right thing, and went to the corner." (Mercante said after that Grier denied throwing the white towel when Mercante asked him about it.) Now, the trainer could have come up to the apron with a commissioner to stop it, by disqualification. And Grier could have stopped the fight in between rounds, by telling the doctor or ref. And the fighter wanted to continue."

"Foreman's a fighter, a champion, he came to fight, to defend himself, and his belt, and his people," Lathan continued. "There were some great exchanges still. I think Arthur did a remarkable job, he did what he was supposed to do. He knows the rules, he responded appropriately. All in all, it was a magical evening of boxing. We had full cooperation from all forces, the NYPD, MTA, State Police, Yankee Stadium security, our office. No one was hurt. It was a great evening, for the families, for the people in the Bronx, for boxing."

FYI Lathan's tenure as chief was just extended, by three years. As far as we can discern, the refs and judges underneath her umbrella appreciate the fact that she backs them up, and doesn't second guess them. If I'm Mercante, I'm appreciative, because in this day and age, cover your ass is the prime motivator for too many people in power. But Lathan is in his corner, full on, and seems to understand that critics will rail from the sidelines, expecting perfection during a period of disarray.

Could he or should he have pulled the plug, because Foreman's leg compromised his mobility? Maybe. But as I said before, don't we revere those fighters who keep on competing, even though they broke their hand, or their eye is closed? Don't the fighters themselves enter the ring with eyes wide open? Didn't Foreman desire to keep battling, and was he not defending himself and answering back with offense?

Bottom line, Mercante did indeed adhere to the rulebook. Should we look hard at the rule as it exists in the rulebook? Maybe so. But on June 5, Mercante did indeed act in accordance with the rulebook.

Source: thesweetscience.com